Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med. 2016 May 5;129(10):1093–1099.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.04.009

Table 1.

Summary of Clinician Responses to the Survey

All respondents
N=90

Question N* %
Pharmacogenomics was part of training/medical education 26/87 30
Talked to a patient about pharmacogenomics results 8/90 9
Plan to use pharmacogenomics results in the future to:
 Guide future prescribing selection when appropriate 32/86 37
 Guide future dosing when appropriate 27/86 31
 Call for pharmacy consultation 17/86 20
 Do not plan to use 6/86 7
 Do not know at this time 39/86 45
Expect to order or recommend a pharmacogenomic test in next 6 months 6/87 7
Remembered receiving the informational packet 27/90 30
 Informational packet was at least somewhat helpful 19/27 70
Remembered seeing a drug-gene alert 37/87 43
 Sometimes, often, or always changed the prescription due to alert§ 15/37 41
Perception of the PGx-CDS alert§,
 Positive response (alert was helpful, convenient, or easy to understand) 12/36 33
 Negative response (alert was confusing, irritating, frustrating, or it was difficult to find additional information) 19/36 53
 Both positive and negative responses 5/36 14
*

Non-missing values reported; responders not shown, and not included in the percentages based on non-missing values.

Respondents could check all that applied.

Denominator is the 27 participants who remembered receiving the informational packet.

§

Denominator is the 37 participants who remembered seeing a drug-gene alert.