Table 1.
Summary of Clinician Responses to the Survey
All respondents N=90 |
||
---|---|---|
| ||
Question | N* | % |
Pharmacogenomics was part of training/medical education | 26/87 | 30 |
Talked to a patient about pharmacogenomics results | 8/90 | 9 |
Plan to use pharmacogenomics results in the future to:† | ||
Guide future prescribing selection when appropriate | 32/86 | 37 |
Guide future dosing when appropriate | 27/86 | 31 |
Call for pharmacy consultation | 17/86 | 20 |
Do not plan to use | 6/86 | 7 |
Do not know at this time | 39/86 | 45 |
Expect to order or recommend a pharmacogenomic test in next 6 months | 6/87 | 7 |
Remembered receiving the informational packet | 27/90 | 30 |
Informational packet was at least somewhat helpful‡ | 19/27 | 70 |
Remembered seeing a drug-gene alert | 37/87 | 43 |
Sometimes, often, or always changed the prescription due to alert§ | 15/37 | 41 |
Perception of the PGx-CDS alert§,† | ||
Positive response (alert was helpful, convenient, or easy to understand) | 12/36 | 33 |
Negative response (alert was confusing, irritating, frustrating, or it was difficult to find additional information) | 19/36 | 53 |
Both positive and negative responses | 5/36 | 14 |
Non-missing values reported; responders not shown, and not included in the percentages based on non-missing values.
Respondents could check all that applied.
Denominator is the 27 participants who remembered receiving the informational packet.
Denominator is the 37 participants who remembered seeing a drug-gene alert.