Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2017 Jun 3;97:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.06.001

Table 4.

Multilevel Modeling Results for Cognitive Reappraisal Indicators

Disputing Reappraisal Perceived
Reappraisal
Success

b t b t b T
Intercept 35.79 6.37*** 26.6 4.50*** 26.69 4.87***
Age 0.20 1.23 0.17 1.00 0.22 1.40
Session 0.76 3.10** 1.50 5.69*** 1.31 5.87***
Group 1.43 0.44 3.46 1.02 −1.86 −0.63
Session × Group 0.84 2.44* 0.15 0.40 0.91 2.89**
Residuals Wald Z Wald Z
Level 1 166.68 21.81*** 224.79 21.83*** 181.47 21.80***
Intercept 207.71 5.51*** 210.91 5.08*** 157.95 4.99***
Session 1.87 4.40*** 1.99 4.03*** 1.29 3.63***
Int/Session Covariance −9.95 −3.00** −9.34 −2.47* −4.31 −1.61
Model Fit
−2LL 9538.10 9840.87 9590.02
AIC 9556.10 9858.87 9608.02
BIC 9601.56 9904.33 9653.47

Note: Group refers to CBGT (cognitive behavioral group therapy) vs. MBSR (mindfulness-based stress reduction). −2LL = −2 × log-likelihood, AIC = Akaike’s Information Criterion, BIC = Bayesian’s Information Criterion

*

p < .01,

**

p < .005,

***

p < .001