Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2017 Jun 3;97:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.06.001

Table 6.

Granger Causality Time Series Analysis of Weekly Cognitive Reappraisal and Mindfulness Predicting Subsequent Weekly Social Anxiety Intensity During CBGT and MBSR

Predictor F, ΔR2 b, SE of b, 95% CI β, t
CBT-related Processes
Reappraisal
    CBGT 4.95*, .03 −.70, .33,[−1.44, .04] −.46, 2.12
    MBSR 1.86, .01 −.32, .25, [−.87, .23] −.21, 1.30
Perceived Reappraisal Success
    CBGT 4.52*, .03 −.50, .25, [−1.-5, .05] −.42, 2.03
    MBSR 1.54, .01 −.37, .31, [−1.05, .32] −.22, 1.19
Disputing
    CBGT 3.76, .03 −.64, .34, [−1.40, .13] −.38, 1.85
    MBSR 8.13*, .03 −.57, .21, [−1.03, −.10] −.23, 2.72*
MBSR-related Processes
Mindful Attitude
    CBGT 2.47, .02 −.59, .40, [−1.47, .29] −.29, 1.50
    MBSR 4.89*, .02 −.57, .27, [−1.16, .03] −.46, 2.11
  Acceptance
    CBGT 1.16, .01 −.53, .52, [−1.70, .63] −.10, 1.03
    MBSR 1.51, 009 −.23, .20, [−.66, .21] −.12, 1.17
Perceived Acceptance Success
    CBGT 1.14, .010 −.47, .46, [−1.49, .55] −.10, 1.10
    MBSR 2.77, .014 −.36, .23, [−.86, .14] −.25, 1.59

Note: F-value tests the additional variance explained (ΔR2) when adding the predictor variable after controlling for the one-lag autoregression model AR(1) and has degrees of freedom (2,11). b = unstandardized beta, β = standardized beta, SE = standard error, CI = confidence interval.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001