Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol. 2016 Jul 6;71(3):368–378. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.023

Table 4.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and membranous urethral length (MUL) measurement procedures

MRI equipment Use of an endorectal coil Professional measuring MUL Plane used for MUL measurement Were the assessor(s) blinded to patient continence data when measuring the MUL MUL, mean ± SD (mm) MUL range (mm)
Choi et al [14] 2015 3T No Urologist Sagittal Yes 11.9 ± 2.5 5–23
Kadono et al [15] 2015 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Matsushita et al [16] 2015 1.5 and 3T Yes Radiologist Coronal Yes 12.3 ± 3.7 10, 15a
Tienza et al [17] 2015 1.5T NR Radiologist Sagittal Yes 14.3 ± 4.5 6.7–34.3
Jeong et al [18] 2014 1.5T NR NR NR NR 12.8 ± 2.75 5–23
Lee et al [19] 2014 1.5T NR 2 radiologists Coronal Yes 12.3 ± 2.5 5–21.5
Jeong et al [20] 2013 1.5T NR 2 radiologists Coronal NR 12.8 ± 2.7 6–23
Lee et al [21] 2013 1.5T Yes Urologist Coronal Yes 11.9 ± 2.5 5.6–20.5
Kim et al [22] 2011 1.5T No Urologist Sagittal Yes 11.2 ± 3.1 5–23
Lim et al [23] 2012 NR No Radiologist Sagittal cross-referenced with coronal Yes 10.4 ± 3.8 NR
Paparel et al [24] 2009 1.5 Yes Radiologist and urologist by consensus Sagittal cross-referenced with coronal Yes 13.3 ± 3 6–21
Lee et al [25] 2006 1.5T No 2 radiologists Coronal Yes NR NR
Coakley et al [26] 2002 1.5T Yes 2 radiologists Coronal Yes 14.5 ± 3.5 6–24
a

Interquartile range.

NR = not reported; SD = standard deviation; T = Tesla.