Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Place. 2017 Jul 25;47:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.07.004

Table 3.

Potential mediation of the association between near park area and current depression by time spent walking/week (IPAQ questionnaire), perceived stress score (Cohen’s Perceived Stress Scale) and neighborhood satisfaction score (Domain 4 of the WHO-QoL-BREF scale).

Hypothesized mediators Coefficients# Estimate Standard Error
Time spent walking per week a -4.84E-05 6.27E-04
b -1.28E-03 6.59E-04
ab (mediated effect) 6.18E-08
95% CI (-1.51E-06 - 1.63E-06)
Significance Not significant
Perceived stress score a -2.05E-06 4.84E-06
b 1.56E-01 6.24E-02
ab (mediated effect) -3.21E-07
95% CI (-1.8E-06 - 1.81E-06)
Significance Not significant
Neighbourhood satisfaction score a -2.83E-06 1.15E-05
b -2.15E-01 3.56E-02
ab (mediated effect) 6.08E-07
95% CI (-4.25E-06 - 5.47E-06)
Significance Not significant

Notes: Mediation analysis was performed using the ‘product of coefficients approach’ (MacKinnon, 2008; MacKinnon, Lockwood, Brown, Wang, & Hoffman, 2007a).

#

‘a’ and ‘b’ refer to the estimated regression coefficients in the following two equations - M = i1 + a X+ d Z + e 1 ; Y = i 2 + c’ X+ b M + d’ Z+ e2 (MacKinnon, 2008). M refers to the hypothesized mediator, X is the independent variable (near park area), Y is the dependent variable (current major depression) and Z refers to all confounding variables combined. Standard error of the product of coefficients (ab) was calculated using the following equation – σab=σa2b2+σb2a2 and 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated using equation – ab ± 1.96*(σab) Since all the estimated confidence intervals contained 0, we concluded that none of the hypothesized mediating variables had significant mediating effects.