Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 12;8:1566. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01566

Table 5.

Mean DP estimates for varieties with either high or low alleles at candidate markers.

Marker Type Allele Count Mean (SEM) t df p
SNP Assay 1 Winter H (T) 33 101.5 (3.57) 3.23 74 <0.001
L (G) 43 88.1 (2.6)
SNP Assay 3 Winter H (T) 24 104.9 (4.24) 4.05 73 <0.001
L (A) 51 89.1 (1.92)
SNP Assay 5 Winter H (C) 36 96.8 (2.81) 1.67 73 0.05
L (T) 39 90.8 (2.5)
SNP Assay 6 Winter H (A) 12 104.5 (5.91) 4.07 73 <0.001
L (T) 63 91.8 (0.94)
SNP Assay 7 Winter H (C) 28 100.6 (3.34) 3.15 74 0.001
L (G) 48 90.1 (1.8)
SNP Assay 8 Winter H (A) 16 102.3 (5.69) 2.75 74 0.004
L (G) 60 91.5 (1.49)
SNP Assay 9 Spring H (T) 65 93.9 (1.63) 1.9 80 0.031
L (G) 17 85.5 (6.28)
SNP Assay 10 Spring H (T) 64 94.6 (1.55) 2.68 80 0.005
L (G) 18 83.6 (5.55)
SNP Assay 11 Spring H (A) 53 94.3 (1.78) 1.8 79 0.038
L (G) 28 88.1 (3.34)

The nucleotide associated with each allele is shown in brackets. For each marker, the number of varieties in each allelic category is shown, and the mean for each category (with standard error of the mean shown in brackets). The t-statistic for the comparison of the two alleles is shown also, along with the p-value for the right tail of the t-distribution (testing the hypothesis that the mean of the high allele is greater than that of the low allele). Variation in the total number of lines between markers is due to missing data.