Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 13;8:1580. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01580

Table 3.

Fit indices for measurement invariance, unconditional latent growth model (LGM), and trajectory model.

Model X2 df CFI TLI RMSEA [90% CI] ΔCFI ΔRMSEA ΔWLSMV X2df)
MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE
Configural 296.14*** 72 0.98 0.97 0.030 [0.027–0.034]
Metric 267.04*** 80 0.98 0.98 0.026 [0.023–0.030] 0.003 0.004 4.409 (8)ns
Scalar 567.86*** 100 0.96 0.96 0.037 [0.034–0.040] 0.025 0.011 388.26(20)***
Unconditional LGM 320.94*** 89 0.98 0.98 0.028 [0.025–0.031]
TRAJECTORY MODEL
Conduct Age 4 311.11*** 124 0.96 0.95 0.021 [0.018–0.024]
Conduct Age 5 319.41*** 124 0.96 0.95 0.022 [0.019–0.025]
Conduct Age 6 312.37*** 124 0.96 0.95 0.021 [0.018–0.024]

X2, chi-square; df, degree of freedom; CFI, comparative fit index; TLI, Tucker-Lewis Index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation with 95% confidence interval; ΔCFI, change in comparative fit index; ΔWLSMV X2, change in WLSMV chi-square using chi-square difference test; Δdf – change in degree of freedom.

***

p < 0.001;

ns

nonsignificant.