Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 7;56(38):11409–11414. doi: 10.1002/anie.201704654

Table 1.

Occupancy of Aurora A conformations under different conditions.

Ligand(s) Ligand concentration [μm] K m, K i, or IC50m] Inactive T‐loop [%][a] Active T‐loop [%][a] K eq [b] ΔG inactive–active at 25 °C [kcal mol−1][c]
Apo 23 77 0.3 0.7
MLN8054 10 0.0003[d] 43 57 0.7 0.2
CD532 10 0.048[e] 64 36 1.8 −0.4
TPX2 5 0.01[f] 14 86 0.2 1.1
TPX2/MLN8054 5/10 0.01[f]/0.0003[d] 15 85 0.2 1.0
AMPPNP 1000 ND 22 78 0.3 0.7
ATP 1000 36[g] 32 68 0.5 0.5
Kemptide 3000 330[g] 21 79 0.3 0.8
AMPPNP/Kemptide 1000/3000 ND/330[h] 30 70 0.4 0.5
TPX2/AMPPNP/Kemptide 5/1000/3000 0.01[f]/ND/330[h] 12 88 0.1 1.2

[a] The error of the loop occupancy is propagated from the fitting error of the histograms and is ≤2. [b] K eq=[inactive T‐loop]/[active T‐loop]. The error on K eq is propagated from the fitting error of the histograms and is <0.1. [c] ΔG inactive–active=−RT ln(K eq). The error on ΔG inactive–active is propagated from fitting errors of the histograms and is ≤0.1 kcal mol−1. [d] K i from Ref. 5b. [e] IC50 from Ref. 5d. [f] EC50 from Ref. 4b. [g] K m from Ref. 4b. [h] K m measured in this study (Figure S3) with an error of ±70 μm. ND=not determined.