Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 17;73(Pt 9):731–742. doi: 10.1107/S2053229617010841

Table 2. Crystal data and refinement quality indicators for the five determinations of the structure of (nBu4N)[Co(Or)2(bipy)]·3H2O, (2).

Mol­ecular formula C36H54CoN7O11 or (C16H36N)[Co(C5H2N2O4)2(C10H8N2)2]·3H2O; M r = 819.79.

Structure (2a) (2b) (2c) (2d) (2e)
CCDC reference 1560739 1560740 1560741 1560742 1560743
Crystal 1 1 2 2
Crystal history as prepared after one transition monoclinic to triclinic following one full cycle monoclinic to triclinic to monoclinic following 1.5 full cycles, monoclinic to triclinic to monoclinic to mixed monoclinic/triclinic
T (K) 277 (1) 100 (1) 220 (1) 170 (1) 170 (1)
Crystal condition single twin single multicrystal
Crystal system monoclinic triclinic monoclinic monoclinic triclinic
Space group P2/n P Inline graphic P2/n P2/n P Inline graphic
Z 2 2 2 2 2
Ha (H2O, N—H) located and refined xyz and U iso refined no xyz and U iso refined xyz refined and U iso constrained xyz refined and U iso constrained
Resolutionb (Å) 0.84 0.78 0.77 0.77 0.84
No. data, total 10924 15136 21720 22527 25546
Independent data 4564 15136 4673 4643 6796
R int 0.0664 twinc 0.0499 0.1647 0.1521
Parameters 264 501 264 282 524
Restraints 0 0 0 39 0
R1 [F 2 > 2σ(F 2] 0.0549 0.0949 0.0480 0.0664 0.0617
wR2 (all data used) 0.1100 0.2481 0.1294 0.1646 0.1608
Quality-of-fit 1.021 1.439 1.070 1.075 1.052
a (Å) 13.1679 (12) 12.9054 (8) 13.0259 (4) 13.0080 (8) 13.0155 (15)
b (Å) 9.3413 (9) 9.3791 (8) 9.3504 (3) 9.3320 (6) 9.4028 (14)
c (Å) 16.3388 (14) 16.1290 (12) 16.3308 (5) 16.3753 (12) 16.2640 (17)
α (°) 90 88.724 (6) 90 90 88.794 (11)
β (°) 102.669 (9) 102.898 (6) 103.847 (3) 104.364 (7) 103.054 (9)
γ (°) 90 88.528 (6) 90 90 88.687 (11)
V, Å3 1960.8 (3) 1901.6 (2) 1931.24 (11) 1925.7 (2) 1937.8 (4)
Δρmax,Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.478, −0.309 2.876, −0.771 1.044, −0.915 0.741, −0.731 1.630, −0.899

Notes: (a) H atoms bonded to O or N atoms. Whether or not these H atoms are located and refined is an indicator for the reliability of the structure analysis. (b) Resolution is estimated as the minimum Bragg spacing to which data are at least 95% complete, based on the Laue group. (c) Structure (2b) was refined using data from two domains in the same refinement. Traditional data merging was not performed. Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2006), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006, 2009), CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011), SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2004).