Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 27;71(8):e12979. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12979

Table 3.

Predicted 10‐year NNT with an anti‐PCSK9 antibody (with a predicted 60% LDL‐C reduction from baseline) to prevent 1 CVE for various absolute 10‐year risk of major CVEs and various baseline LDL‐C levels

Absolute 10‐year risk of a major CVEa Baseline LDL‐C levels, mg/dL (mmol/L) Predicted LDL‐C reductions achieved with anti‐PCSK9 antibody treatment, mg/dL (mmol/L) Predicted LDL‐C levels following anti‐PCSK9 antibody treatment, mg/dL (mmol/L) Predicted 10‐year absolute risk of a major CVE with anti‐PCSK9 antibody treatmentb 10‐year NNT to prevent 1 CVEc
60% 200 (5.2) 120 (3.1) 80 (2.1) 28% 4
160 (4.1) 96 (2.5) 64 (1.7) 32% 4
120 (3.1) 72 (1.7) 48 (1.2) 38% 5
80 (2.1) 48 (1.2) 32 (0.83) 44% 6
30% 200 (5.2) 120 (3.1) 80 (2.1) 14% 6
160 (4.1) 96 (2.5) 64 (1.7) 16% 7
120 (3.1) 72 (1.7) 48 (1.2) 19% 9
80 (2.1) 48 (1.2) 32 (0.83) 22% 13
15% 200 (5.2) 120 (3.1) 80 (2.1) 7% 13
160 (4.1) 96 (2.5) 64 (1.7) 8% 15
120 (3.1) 72 (1.7) 48 (1.2) 9% 18
80 (2.1) 48 (1.2) 32 (0.83) 11% 26

CTT, Cholesterol Treatment Trialists; CVE, cardiovascular event; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol; NNT, number needed to treat; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. aPatients may or may not be receiving LLT. bUsing data from the CTT meta‐analysis.5 cNNT for 10 years to prevent one CVE=100/([1−0.78n]×10‐year CVE risk in %), where n=LDL‐C reduction in mmol/L and 0.78 represents the decrease in CVD risk for each 1 mmol/L reduction in LDL‐C.5, 19