Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 2;18(8):967–977. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0841-y

Table 2.

Discrete choice parameter estimates (probit regression) based on responses from all countries

N = 1775 (547 + 404 + 407 + 417)
Obs = 35,500 [1775(j)×10(pairs)×2(I)]a
Coef SE Sign
Constantb −0.124 0.015 0.000
MO2 −0.299 0.031 0.000
0.000
MO3 −0.349 0.035
MO4 −0.923 0.036 0.000
MO5 −1.326 0.039 0.000
SC2 −0.208 0.033 0.000
SC3 −0.290 0.035 0.000
SC4 −0.793 0.036 0.000
SC5 −0.966 0.035 0.000
UA2 −0.194 0.032 0.000
UA3 −0.254 0.035 0.000
UA4 −0.769 0.035 0.000
UA5 −0.987 0.035 0.000
PD2 −0.248 0.033 0.000
PD3 −0.241 0.035 0.000
PD4 −1.017 0.036 0.000
PD5 −1.258 0.036 0.000
AD2 −0.195 0.034 0.008
AD3 −0.454 0.035 0.000
AD4 −1.183 0.037 0.000
AD5 −1.401 0.038 0.000
Log likelihood −9043.843
Wald chi2 (20) 4817.43
AIC 18,129.686
BIC 18,307.709
Degrees of freedom 21

a I Number of alternatives, j number of respondents

bIn the set of coefficients the constant represents the alternative specific constant, capturing a tendency to always choose the first option