Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 26;25(10):1134–1141. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.119

Table 2. RARS variations in our cohort.

Position
Pathogenicity prediction
Conservation Level
Patient Exon cDNA Protein Sift GVGD Polyphen-2 Mutationtaster PhyloP PhastCons MAF Genotype Inheritance
P1&P2 1 c.[5A>G] p.(Asp2Gly) Tolerated Class C65 (most likely) Benign Disease causing 3.183 1 0.00013 Homozygous Maternal & paternal
P3 12 c.[1367C>T] p.(Ser456Leu) Damaging Class C65 (most likely) Probably damaging Disease causing 2.036 0.998 0.00048 Heterozygous Maternal
  14 c.[1846_1847delTA] p. (Tyr616Leufs*6) NA NA NA Disease causing 1.032 1 NA Heterozygous De novo? Non-paternity?

Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; MAF, minor allele frequenc. PhyloP: values vary between −14 and +6 (Sites predicted to be conserved are assigned positive scores); PhastCons: values vary between 0 and 1. The closer the value is to 1, the more probable the nucleotide is conserved. Transcription reference sequence: NM_002887.3.