Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 15;60(4):679–692. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0903-7

Table 1.

Clustered key drivers identified in key informant interviews influencing grassland management decisions of farmers, grouped according to Wilson’s concept of community resilience (Wilson 2010); time horizon of scenarios ~2050

Categories Key drivers
Economic capital
 Village community development Tourism -Market for specialities, niche products, local food
-Demand for tourist services (e.g., accommodation, living museum for tourists)
Agricultural market Demand for local products (e.g., Soliva et al. 2008)
Community services Market for community services (e.g., biogas)
Settlement Demand for building sites (pressure on agricultural land)
 Farm management Supplementary income -On farm (e.g. holidays on farm, gastronomy in alpine huts)
-Off-farm in the village (especially in tourism)
-Off-farm (commuting to Innsbruck)
-Time to manage grassland parallel to off-farm employment
Farm succession Uncertain/guaranteed
Structural change -Expansion or termination of business (due to market)
-Technological treadmill (need for new machinery) (e.g., Schermer 2015; Schermer et al. 2016)
-Accessibility of grassland sites and steepness (innovation produced by machinery)
Social capital
 Political intervention Subsidies Provision of a basic income (e.g., direct payments). In Tyrol, Austria, on average >80% of farmers’ income comes from public transfer payments (Schermer et al. 2016)
Regulations -Animal husbandry (e.g., barn regulation)
-Environmental regulations (e.g., landscape conservation, protection of alpine pastures)
 Farming community Social organization (e.g., farmers, farm wives) and associations (breeders association) -Attitude towards farming (e.g., Schermer et al. 2016)
-Collaboration among farmers
-Management of commons
-Cooperation with municipality
Environmental capital
 Natural conditions—climate change Climate change scenario based on IPCC A1B (Gobiet et al. 2014) Need/possibilities for irrigation (increase in temperature by +1.5–2 K until 2050)
Natural hazards Retention sites to protect against extreme events and natural catastrophes (e.g., protective forest instead of pasture) (e.g., Beniston 2012)