Table 4.
The prevalence of dysfunction in our study (for 168 participants) compared to other studies.
| Study | Age (y) | N | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD with BD | AD | BD | |||
| Lara et al16 (2001) | 10–35 | 265 | 22.3 | 9.4 | 12.9 |
| Hokoda21 (1985) | <35 | 119 | 21.0 | 16.8 | 4.2 |
| Montés-Micó19 (2001) | 18–38 | 1679 | 56.3 | 34.6 | 21.7 |
| Porcar & Martinez-Palomera20 (1997) | 19–25 | 65 | 32.3 | 17.0 | 15.3 |
| Scheiman et al18 (1996) | 6 mo–18 y | 2030 | 19.7 | 5.4 | 14.3 |
| Garcia et al17 (2002) | 13–35 | 69 | 72.4 | 44.9 | 27.5 |
| Shin et al14 (2009) | 9–13 | 82 | 69.5 | 35.4 | 34.1 |
| Present study | 8–13 | 168 | 28.5 | 12.0 | 16.5 |
AD = accommodative dysfunctions; BD = binocular dysfunctions.