Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 26;8(6):677–686. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2017.08.005

Table 3.

Effect of aqueous extract of Prunus armeniaca on growth performance of broiler chickens at high altitude.

Treatments
Parameters Control T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
Initial live body weight (g/chick) 37.20 ± 0.40 37.46 ± 0.55 38.00 ± 0.37 38.13 ± 0.63 37.13 ± 0.52 37.60 ± 0.66 38.06 ± 0.52
Live weight at 21 day (g/chick) 184.71 ± 7.69 195.46 ± 4.76 203.14 ± 8.04 209.20 ± 9.46 204.28 ± 8.32 198.00 ± 3.98 200.40 ± 10.78
Live weight at 42 day (g/chick) 348.53a ± 10.41 410.13b ± 8.30 417.57b,c ± 9.03 450.14d ± 8.59 440.28c,d ± 8.70 408.80b ± 10.41 398.15b ± 8.30
Cumulative feed intake up to 42 day (g/chick) 1511.21 ± 6.26 1514.12 ± 6.00 1524.41 ± 5.77 1519.33 ± 5.26 1519.40 ± 4.80 1525.46 ± 4.70 1518.48 ± 5.92
Feed conversion ratio at 42 day 4.86d ± 0.04 4.06b ± 0.05 4.02b ± 0.06 3.69a ± 0.05 3.77a ± 0.05 4.11b ± 0.04 4.22c ± 0.04
Cumulative water intake up to 42 day (mL/chick) 2245.60 ± 6.27 2250.52 ± 5.44 2240.84 ± 5.31 2255.56 ± 6.72 2250.35 ± 5.39 2250.19 ± 6.45 2240.15 ± 5.59

C, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, and T6 represent groups of chickens received aqueous extract of Prunus armeniaca in drinking water at concentration level of 0, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, and 800 mg/kg body weight of chicken respectively.

Results are presented as mean ± S.E, n = 15 (3 replicates with 5 chickens each).

Means bearing the different superscripts (a, b, c, d) in a row differ significantly (P < 0.05).