Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 18.
Published in final edited form as: School Psych Rev. 2013;42(1):76–98.

Table 4.

Relation of Dimensional Teacher-Student Quality Interaction Scales to End-of-year Test Scores (Covarying Prior Year Achievement and Demographic Factors)

Predicting End-of-year Achievement Scores From:

Emotional Support Classroom Organization Instructional Support



Positive
Climate
B
(SE)
Negative
Climate
B
(SE)
Teacher
Sensitivity
B
(SE)
Regard for
Adolescent
Perspective
B
(SE)
Behavior
Management
B
(SE)
Productivity
B
(SE)
Instructional
Learning
Formats
B
(SE)
Content
Understanding
B
(SE)
Analysis &
Problem
Solving
B
(SE)
Quality
of
Feedback
B
(SE)
Intercept 363.7***
(44.37)
480.8***
(32.24)
389.8***
(47.39)
400.6***
(36.29)
438.1***
(55.70)
372.8***
(59.10)
367.9***
(42.73)
423.3***
(41.19)
417.0***
(35.54)
431.7***
(45.38)
Baseline Achievement
  Score
.61***
(.03)
.61***
(.03)
.61***
(.03)
.61***
(.03)
.61***
(.03)
.61***
(.03)
.61***
(.03)
.61***
(.03)
.61***
(.03)
.61***
(.03)
Student Grade-Level 4.78
(3.58)
4.13
(3.89)
5.35
(3.78)
4.67
(3.6)
3.93
(3.87)
3.88
(3.76)
6.17
(3.65)
3.98
(3.79)
5.97
(3.82)
5.30
(4.03)
Student Gender
  (1 = M; 2 = F)
2.02
(3.39)
1.98
(3.39)
1.88
(3.39)
1.83
(3.39)
1.98
(3.39)
2.01
(3.39)
2.14
(3.39)
1.94
(3.39)
1.92
(3.39)
1.93
(3.39)
Student Family Poverty
  Status
−2.97
(4.33)
−3.37
(4.34)
−3.45
(4.33)
−3.33
(4.32)
−3.27
(4.34)
−3.15
(4.33)
−3.52
(4.32)
−3.01
(4.34)
−3.12
(4.33)
−3.17
(4.34)
Classroom size
−0.09
(1.03)
−.48
(1.15)
−0.37
(1.15)
−0.19
(1.04)
−.51
(1.13)
−0.34
(1.09)
−.85
(1.02)
−0.84
(1.11)
−0.29
(1.07)
−0.45
(1.12)
Interaction Quality
  Variable
23.1**
(7.89)
−9.25
(18.75)
16.36*
(7.95)
18.03**
(6.73)
5.89
(8.53)
17.68
(9.47)
24.94**
(8.41)
14.11
(9.27)
15.19*
(6.89)
9.32
(8.55)

Note.

***

p < .001.

**

p ≤ .01.

*

p < .05.

‘Interaction Quality Variable’ results for each column refer to the specific classroom interaction quality noted in the column heading.