Table 4.
Predicting End-of-year Achievement Scores From: | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emotional Support | Classroom Organization | Instructional Support | ||||||||
Positive Climate B (SE) |
Negative Climate B (SE) |
Teacher Sensitivity B (SE) |
Regard for Adolescent Perspective B (SE) |
Behavior Management B (SE) |
Productivity B (SE) |
Instructional Learning Formats B (SE) |
Content Understanding B (SE) |
Analysis & Problem Solving B (SE) |
Quality of Feedback B (SE) |
|
Intercept | 363.7*** (44.37) |
480.8*** (32.24) |
389.8*** (47.39) |
400.6*** (36.29) |
438.1*** (55.70) |
372.8*** (59.10) |
367.9*** (42.73) |
423.3*** (41.19) |
417.0*** (35.54) |
431.7*** (45.38) |
Baseline Achievement Score |
.61*** (.03) |
.61*** (.03) |
.61*** (.03) |
.61*** (.03) |
.61*** (.03) |
.61*** (.03) |
.61*** (.03) |
.61*** (.03) |
.61*** (.03) |
.61*** (.03) |
Student Grade-Level | 4.78 (3.58) |
4.13 (3.89) |
5.35 (3.78) |
4.67 (3.6) |
3.93 (3.87) |
3.88 (3.76) |
6.17 (3.65) |
3.98 (3.79) |
5.97 (3.82) |
5.30 (4.03) |
Student Gender (1 = M; 2 = F) |
2.02 (3.39) |
1.98 (3.39) |
1.88 (3.39) |
1.83 (3.39) |
1.98 (3.39) |
2.01 (3.39) |
2.14 (3.39) |
1.94 (3.39) |
1.92 (3.39) |
1.93 (3.39) |
Student Family Poverty Status |
−2.97 (4.33) |
−3.37 (4.34) |
−3.45 (4.33) |
−3.33 (4.32) |
−3.27 (4.34) |
−3.15 (4.33) |
−3.52 (4.32) |
−3.01 (4.34) |
−3.12 (4.33) |
−3.17 (4.34) |
Classroom size |
−0.09 (1.03) |
−.48 (1.15) |
−0.37 (1.15) |
−0.19 (1.04) |
−.51 (1.13) |
−0.34 (1.09) |
−.85 (1.02) |
−0.84 (1.11) |
−0.29 (1.07) |
−0.45 (1.12) |
Interaction Quality Variable |
23.1** (7.89) |
−9.25 (18.75) |
16.36* (7.95) |
18.03** (6.73) |
5.89 (8.53) |
17.68 (9.47) |
24.94** (8.41) |
14.11 (9.27) |
15.19* (6.89) |
9.32 (8.55) |
Note.
p < .001.
p ≤ .01.
p < .05.
‘Interaction Quality Variable’ results for each column refer to the specific classroom interaction quality noted in the column heading.