Table 3.
First author; publication year | All data (P) |
ER− (P) |
ER+ (P) |
LN+ (P) |
LN− (P) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nagalla et al29 2013 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.63 | 0.25 |
Teschendorff et al25 2007 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.91 | 0.14 |
Oh et al27 2012 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.68 | 0.01 |
Ursini-Siegel et al31 2010 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.30 | 0.47 | 0.01 |
Teschendorff et al26 2010 | 0.01 | 0.38 | 0.03 | 0.47 | 0.08 |
Bianchini et al28 2010 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
Cheng et al32 2013 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.33 | 0.67 | 0.97 |
Yau et al30 2010 | 0.15 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.99 | 0.16 |
Note: P-values of heterogeneity analyses in validation data sets are presented when analyzing all the data, ER−, ER+, LN+, and LN− cohorts, respectively.
Abbreviations: ER, estrogen receptor; LN, lymph node.