Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fam Relat. 2017 Jan 17;65(5):647–660. doi: 10.1111/fare.12221

Table 2.

Standardized Parameter Estimates Predicting Child Conduct Problems at Grade 1

Model 1
Full Model
Model 2
Low Gatekeeping
(High Encouragement)
Model 2
High Gatekeeping
(Low Encouragement)

Variable β SE p β SE p β SE p
Target child’s sex .01 .06 .17 .12 .12 .03 .06 .04 .25
Target child’s race .04 .05 .04 .47 .30 .16 .33 .20 .20
Income-to-needs .03 .01 .02 .12 .06 .23 .02 .03 .14
Maternal education .09 .06 .26 .09 .38 .11 .01 .15 .43
Paternal education .07 .06 .19 .35 .12 .09 .11 .14 .23
Study site .01 .03 .31 .16 .18 .18 .00 .15 .33
Maternal gatekeepinga .10 .09 .04
Intimate partner violence .11 .03 < .01 .43 .21 .02 .04 .07 .10
Mothers’ harsh–intrusive parenting .04 .02 .02 .01 .11 .22 .04 .07 .15
Fathers’ harsh–intrusive parenting .08 .05 < .01 .17 .13 .03 .10 .06 .54
a

Maternal gatekeeping was designated in the model as the dichotomized variable “group.”