Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jun 30;65(9):1981–1987. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14983

Table 2.

Individual and combined association of Duke-FI and neighborhood disadvantage with basic ADL, self-rated health (multilevel ordered logit models), and time to death (Cox regression), adjusted for age, sex, race, education, and income.

Katz Basic ADL
Duke Frailty Index ORa (95% CIb) P value Neighborhood disadvantage OR (95% CI) P value
Only Duke Frailty Index entered 5.05 (3.13–6.96) 0.001 --------------------------------
Only neighborhood disadvantage entered ------------------------------- 0.04 (−0.14–0.22) 0.940
Duke Frailty Index and neighborhood disadvantage entered simultaneously 5.04 (3.12–6.95) 0.001 0.03 (−0.15–0.21) 0.900
Self-rated health
Only Duke Frailty Index entered 4.25 (2.89–5.60) 0.001 --------------------------------
Only neighborhood disadvantage entered ------------------------------- 0.07 (−0.04–0.18) 0.154
Duke Frailty Index and neighborhood disadvantage entered simultaneously 4.23 (2.87–5.58) 0.001 0.06 (−0.05–0.18) 0.179
Time to death
Only Duke Frailty Index entered 2.92 (2.13–3.70) 0.001 --------------------------------
Only neighborhood disadvantage entered -------------------------------- 0.04 (−0.03–0.10) 0.921
Duke Frailty Index and neighborhood disadvantage entered simultaneously 2.92 (2.13–3.70) 0.001) 0.04 (−0.03–0.10) 0.941
a

OR = Odds Ratio;

b

CI = Confidence Interval