Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 18;7:11799. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12197-7

Table 4.

QTL for sharp eyespot resistance in the CI12633/ Yangmai 9 224 RIL population across five environments.

QTLa Marker interval Position F2014b F2015 F2016 GH2015 GH2016 Average
LODc R2d Adde LOD R2 Add LOD R2 Add LOD R2 Add LOD R2 Add LOD R2 Add
QSe.jaas-2BS RAC875_c730_234 RAC875_c16697_1502 298.21–355.41 12.0 20.7 5.0 11.0 27.7 4.8 9.9 22.2 7.4 14.6 27.9 5.2
QSe.jaas-4BS RAC875_c49792_228 Kukri_c34353_821 771.6 11.5 32.2 7.5 12.5 37.7 7.0
QSe.jaas-5AL.1 GENE-3601_145 Ku_c21002_908 767.2 4.3 8.3 −3.6 6.2 10.6 −3.6 6.2 14.7 −4.3 5.1 13.1 −4.5
QSe.jaas-5AL.2 IAAV3043 wsnp_Ex_c55777_58153636 774.5 3.0 5.8 −3.0 4.4 7.8 −3.1 4.6 11.3 −3.8 3.9 9.1 −3.9
QSe.jaas-5BS wsnp_Ku_c11721_19085513 BS00068710_51 584.41–695.51 3.1 6.2 −3.2 3.0 5.2 −2.9 3.7 7.1 −2.9

aQTL were detected with a LOD threshold of 3.0 for declaring significance based on 2000 permutations at P = 0.01; bF2014, evaluated in field during the 2013–2014 cropping season; F2015, evaluated in field during the 2014–2015 cropping season; F2016, evaluated in field during the 2015–2016 cropping season; GH2015, evaluated in greenhouse during the 2014–2015 cropping season; GH2016, evaluated in greenhouse during the 2015–2016 cropping season; Average, averaged data across five environments; cLOD score; dPercentage of phenotypic variation explained by the QTL; eAdditive effect of resistance alleles.