Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 18;18:739. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4049-z

Table 4.

Predicted housekeeping genes from the thyroid transcriptome map (explanation in the text); (n = 45)

Gene symbol Chromosome Location Expression value Data points SD
Hs.670607 chr4 N/A 232.70 18 11.95
BLOC1S2 chr10 10q24.31 181.44 22 13.39
Hs.706927 chr6 N/A 357.37 18 13.82
TMEM256 chr17 17p13.1 153.91 22 18.35
POM121C chr7 7q11.2 347.50 20 22.49
CUEDC2 chr10 10q24.32 210.93 31 22.83
RPLP0* chr12 12q24.2 3,340.82 76 23.40
PJA1 chrX Xq13.1 234.54 31 23.83
Hs.713747 chr1 N/A 169.93 18 23.92
RAB25 chr1 1q22 199.48 31 24.00
CIB1 chr15 15q25.3-q26 314.61 33 25.01
MRPL18 chr6 6q25.3 182.80 23 25.09
SCAMP3 chr1 1q21 152.98 33 25.11
Hs.633993 chr8 N/A 2,050.15 18 25.21
Hs.714416 chr3 N/A 100.67 18 25.31
RBM23 chr14 14q11.2 257.95 31 25.67
Hs.117688 chr8 N/A 160.32 22 25.73
Hs.546523 chr2 N/A 178.40 18 25.96
DCXR chr17 17q25.3 210.53 31 25.98
Hs.193784 chr3 N/A 491.90 22 26.02
ABRACL chr6 6q24.1 116.71 23 26.15
MAP1LC3B2 chr12 12q24.22 157.45 18 26.29
DGCR6 chr22 22q11 209.18 20 26.31
GTPBP6 chrX; chrY Xp22.33; Yp11.32 120.83 23 26.61
AIMP2 chr7 7p22 181.19 43 26.84
CSNK2B chr6 6p21.3 337.74 25 26.89
TM2D2 chr8 8p11.22 256.54 28 27.09
CLIC1 chr6 6p21.3 530.89 25 27.21
Hs.715132 chrX N/A 196.12 22 27.42
Hs.732277 chr19 N/A 218.68 22 28.49
Hs.705664 chr7 N/A 1,167.55 18 28.62
NMRAL1 chr16 16p13.3 110.71 45 28.70
Hs.713819 chr5 N/A 241.81 18 28.93
RPP21 chr6 6p22.1 111.91 23 28.94
PNMA1 chr14 14q24.3 148.75 23 28.94
ACTG1* chr17 17q25 3,583.46 180 29.06
AKR1B1 chr7 7q35 258.94 25 29.09
APOA1BP chr1 1q21 231.69 32 29.35
MRPL24 chr1 1q23.1 183.95 31 29.44
ABCF1 chr6 6p21.33 123.95 25 29.56
ZNF627 chr19 19p13.2 112.37 24 29.70
METRNL chr17 17q25.3 175.03 22 29.78
OCIAD2 chr4 4p11 286.18 20 29.92
EIF2B2 chr14 14q24.3 248.05 33 29.94
DIABLO chr12 12q24.31 211.60 31 29.98

Genes are sorted in ascending order of SD as percentage of the mean value. *In bold, the two best genes at behaving like a housekeeping gene due to a combination of a low SD, a high expression value and a high number of data points, following checking in the “Values A” TRAM table that the 180 (ACTG1) and 76 (RPLP0) data points are derived from 33 and 22 samples, respectively, out of the 35 thyroid samples analyzed. N/A: not available in the Gene database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene) when the analysis was performed