Table 2.
Coding scheme for qualitative analysis of items A1 and A2
| Category label | Criteria |
|---|---|
| A1. Did you find the 3-min videos helpful? Please elaborate | |
| Learning | |
| • Challenge | Student refers to the ease/difficulty of concepts covered in 3MTLs |
| • Learn | Student refers to a general learning aspect about 3MTLs |
| • Revision | Student refers to a help/lack of thereof provided by 3MTLs for revision |
| • Overview | Student refers to a help/lack of thereof provided by 3MTLs for topic overview |
| • Study | Student refers to a help/lack of thereof provided by 3MTLs for studying the topic |
| • Audio | Student refers to audio feature in 3MTLs that helped/inhibited learning |
| • Visual | Student refers to visual feature in 3MTLs that helped/inhibited learning |
| • Time | Student refers to a comment about time being a factor in 3MTLs |
| • Help | Student refers specifically to help/lack of thereof provided by 3MTLs towards preparation for assessments |
| Engagement | |
| • Compare | Student compares use of 3MTLs to another method of learning |
| • Engage | Student refers to 3MTLs as being OR not being fun/enjoyable/engaging/interesting |
| • Technology | Student mentions a technological issue with respect to using 3MTLs |
| Quality | |
| • Ease | Student refers to ease/difficulty with using 3MTLs |
| • Control | Student refers to control of choice/pace in using 3MTLs |
| • Graphics | Student refers to a comment about picture or animations in 3MTLs |
| • Text | Student refers to a comment about text in 3MTLs |
| • Language | Student refers to a comment about ease/difficulty about language used in 3MTLs |
| Rating scale: −2 = Very negative comment; −1 = Negative comment; 0 = Neutral or no mention; 1 = Positive comment; 2 = Very positive comment | |
| A2. Do you have any suggestions to improve the videos? | |
| Learning | |
| • Challenge | Student suggests about improvement related to concepts covered in 3MTLs |
| • Learn | Student suggests about improvement related to a learning aspect about 3MTLs |
| • Time | Student suggests a comment about increasing/decreasing time of 3MTLs |
| • Number | Student suggests a comment about increasing/decreasing the number of 3MTLs |
| Engagement | |
| • Compare | Student suggests improvement in 3MTLs in comparison to another method of learning |
| • Engage | Student suggestion refers to improving engagement of audience in refers to 3MTLs (being fun/enjoyable/engaging/interesting) |
| • Technology | Student suggests improvement with a technological issue with respect to using 3MTLs |
| Quality | |
| • Control | Student suggests about improvement to control of choice/pace in using 3MTLs |
| • Graphics | Student suggests improvement about picture or animations in 3MTLs |
| • Text | Student suggests improvement about text in 3MTLs |
| • Language | Student suggests improvement about ease/difficulty about language used in 3MTLs |
| • Audio | Student suggests improvement about audio feature in 3MTLs |
| • Visual | Student suggests improvement about visual feature in 3MTLs |
| • Clarity | Student suggests improvement about clarity of presentation in 3MTLs |
| Rating scale for A2: −2 = Needs major improvement; −1 = Needs minor improvement; 0 = Neutral or no mention; 1 = Just adequate at present; 2 = No further improvement necessary | |