Table 4.
Healthya | Traditionala | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Women | Men | Women | Men | |||||
β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | |
ethics and environment | ||||||||
2nd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | 0.047 | [0.018; 0.076] | −0.002 | [−0.061; 0.058] | 0.009 | [−0.015: 0.034] | −0.007 | [−0.065;0.050] |
3rd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | 0.033 | [0.001; 0.065] | −0.007 | [−0.077; 0.064] | 0.025 | [−0.002: 0.052] | −0.037 | [−0.106;0.030] |
traditional and local production | ||||||||
2nd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | 0.080 | [0.051; 0.109] | 0.013 | [−0.046; 0.073] | 0.008 | [−0.016; 0.033] | 0.007 | [−0.050; 0.066] |
3rd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | 0.081 | [0.049; 0.112] | −0.019 | [−0.089; 0.052] | −0.008 | [−0.035; 0.018] | −0.009 | [−0.078; 0.059] |
taste | ||||||||
2nd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | 0.016 | [−0.010; 0.043] | 0.041 | [−0.018; 0.100] | −0.001 | [−0.024; 0.020] | 0.038 | [−0.018; 0.096] |
3rd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | 0.022 | [−0.006; 0.050] | 0.011 | [−0.060; 0.083] | −0.011 | [−0.035; 0.012] | −0.002 | [−0.072; 0.067] |
price | ||||||||
2nd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | −0.015 | [−0.043; 0.013] | −0.025 | [−0.086; 0.036] | −0.001 | [−0.025; 0.020] | 0.010 | [−0.048; 0.069] |
3rd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | −0.040 | [−0.067; −0.013] | −0.074 | [−0.141; −0.007] | 0.004 | [−0.019; 0.027] | −0.014 | [−0.079; 0.051] |
health | ||||||||
2nd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | 0.042 | [0.014; 0.071] | 0.003 | [−0.059; 0.065] | 0.027 | [0.002; 0.052] | 0.011 | [−0.049; 0.072] |
3rd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | 0.069 | [0.040; 0.099] | 0.067 | [0.001; 0.135] | 0.003 | [−0.022; 0.029] | −0.059 | [−0.125; 0.006] |
absence of contaminants | ||||||||
2nd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | 0.046 | [0.017; 0.074] | 0.017 | [−0.044; 0.079] | −0.001 | [−0.026; 0.023] | 0.084 | [0.024; 0.144] |
3rd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | 0.038 | [0.008; 0.069] | 0.028 | [−0.040; 0.095] | −0.019 | [−0.045; 0.007] | −0.013 | [−0.079; 0.052] |
environmental limitations (above median vs. under median) | 0.175 | [0.153; 0.198] | 0.202 | [0.149; 0.255] | −0.087 | [−0.107; −0.068] | −0.130 | [−0.181; −0.078] |
innovation (above median vs. under median) | −0.010 | [−0.033;0.013] | 0.063 | [0.010; 0.116] | −0.011 | [−0.031; 0.008] | −0.061 | [−0.113; −0.009] |
a: parameters estimated with multivariable linear regression models, 8 food choice dimension scores adjusted for age, education and total energy intake; in bold: statiscally significant
β: linear regression coefficient estimate; 95% CI = Confidence interval