Table 5.
Westernb | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Women | Men | |||
β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | |
ethics and environment | ||||
2nd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | 0.014 | [−0.013;0.041] | 0.052 | [−0.009; 0.114] |
3rd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | −0.014 | [−0.043; 0.017] | 0.001 | [−0.071; 0.073] |
traditional and local production | ||||
2nd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | −0.009 | [−0.036; 0.017] | 0.040 | [−0.021; 0.103] |
3rd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | 0.012 | [−0.017; 0.042] | 0.064 | [−0.009; 0.014] |
taste | ||||
2nd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | 0.007 | [−0.017; 0.033] | 0.002 | [−0.059; 0.063] |
3rd tertile of score vs. 1st tertile | 0.037 | [0.011; 0.064] | 0.046 | [−0.028; 0.119] |
health | ||||
2nd tertile of score | −0.051 | [−0.078; −0.023] | −0.114 | [−0.178; −0.049] |
3rd tertile of score | −0.142 | [−0.170; −0.114] | −0.145 | [−0.214; 0.075] |
absence of contaminants | ||||
2nd tertile of score | 0.005 | [−0.021; 0.033] | 0.019 | [−0.045; 0.083] |
3rd tertile of score | −0.006 | [−0.034; 0.023] | −0.001 | [−0.070; 0.069] |
environmental limitations (above median vs under median) | 0.011 | [−0.010; 0.032] | −0.081 | [−0.136; −0.026] |
innovation (above median vs under median) | −0.001 | [−0.021; 0.033] | 0.045 | [−0.010; 0.099] |
b: parameters estimated with multivariables linear regression models, 7 food choice dimensions scores + age, education and total energy intake; in bold: statiscally significant
β: linear regression coefficient estimate; 95% CI = Confidence interval; 95% CI = Confidence interval