Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 19.
Published in final edited form as: Radiol Clin North Am. 2013 Jan;51(1):89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.09.006

Table 1.

Main characteristics and estimates on CTC long-term efficacy of the simulation models on CTC available in the literature.

Author, year* Country Simulation of
de novo
pathogenesis
Polyp types
simulated
CRC stages
simulated
Yearly
progression
from large
polyp to CRC
CTC
accuracy for
large polyps
Frequency
of CTC
repetition
CTC-related
CRC incidence
prevention
CTC-related
CRC mortality
prevention
Sonnenberg et al., 1999 USA No Adenomas§ 1 stage NA 80% 10 yrs 40 NA
Ladabaum et al., 2004 USA Yes Small/Large Loc/Reg/Dis 5% 60%–94%° 10 yrs 51–70 58–79
Heitman et al., 2005 Canada No Small/Large 1 stage NA 71% NA NA NA
Vijan et al., 2007 USA No Low-/High-risk Loc/Reg/Dis NA 82%–91%° 5–10 yrs 71–77 76–81
Hassan et al., 2008 USA Yes Dim./Small/Large Loc/Reg/Dis 3%–4% 90% 10 years 62 NA
Lee et al., 2010 UK No Small/Large Dukes A–D 3% 90% 10 years 77ç 84ç
Knudsen et al., 2010** USA No Dim./Small/Large AJCC Stages 1–4 NA 84%–92% 5 years 48 NA
Heresbach et al., 2010 France No Low-/High-risk NA NA NA NA 36–38 42–46
*

In the case of multiple publications, the most recent was included.

§

Without further classification.

°

Two different scenarios were simulated.

ç

As compared with colonoscopy. occult blood test.

**

MISCAN model