Table 2.

Effects of Neighborhood Disadvantage and Support to Reduce Drinking on Subsequent Problem Drinking

	OR	95% CI	p-value1
Main Effects Models
Neighborhood disadvantage	2.33	[1.17 – 4.60]	0.015
Support to reduce drinking	1.11	[0.78 – 1.58]
Interaction Model
Neighborhood disadvantage	5.85	[2.09 – 16.36]	0.001
Support to reduce drinking	1.28	[0.88 – 1.89]
Neighborhood disadvantage*Support to reduce drinking	0.18	[0.05 – 0.65]	0.009
Neighborhood-stratified: Residents in Disadvantaged Neighborhoods
Support to reduce drinking	0.19	[0.04 – 0.99]	0.048
Neighborhood-stratified: Residents in Non-disadvantaged Neighborhoods
Support to reduce drinking	1.29	[0.89 – 1.89]

Notes: Models were analyzed using general estimating equations to account for participant clustering within neighborhoods. All models controlled for gender, ethnicity, age, marital status, educational attainment, income, parental history of alcohol/drug problems, and baseline problem severity (ASI alcohol and ASI drug or psychiatric scores above the median).

¹All other p-values > 0.10.