Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Appl Stat. 2017 Jul 20;11(2):638–654. doi: 10.1214/16-AOAS997

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Relative efficiency (RE) of various predictive performance summaries by different designs. Figure (a): results for CCH designs. Setting A: simple random sampling; Setting B: matched design and Setting C: balanced design. TIPW (top panel) and AIPW (bottom pane) estimators for each setting are considered, using TIPWopt as benchmark for efficiency. Figure (b) results for NCC designs. Setting D: simple random sample; Setting E: matched design. TIPW estimator under setting D is the benchmark for efficiency.