Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 21;89(1068):20160296. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160296

Table 1.

Summary of studies included in review

Focus Title Authors Year of publication Study type Number of patients/subjects Main conclusions
Feasibility Prostate motion during standard radiotherapy as assessed by FMs Crook et al6 1995 Retrospective cohort 55 Significant prostate motion during radiotherapy. Recommend using markers and EPIDs to verify position of target
Technical aspects of daily online positioning of the prostate for 3D conformal radiotherapy using an EPI device Herman et al7 2003 Prospective feasibility 20 EPID and intraprostatic markers can be used to precisely localize and correct variations in target position following setup to external reference marks
Feasibility of insertion/implantation of 2.0-mm-diameter gold internal FMs for precise setup and real-time tumour tracking in radiotherapy Shirato et al8 2003 Prospective feasibility 93 (31 prostate) Internal FMs can be safely inserted into various organs. Three-marker method has been shown to be useful for spinal/paraspinal and prostate setup
Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and EPI Schallenkamp et al9 2005 Prospective feasibility 20 Independent prostate motion is significant. FMs within the prostate are stable and facilitate margin reduction
A comparison of the use of bony anatomy and internal markers for offline verification and an evaluation of the potential benefit of online and offline verification protocols for prostate radiotherapy McNair et al10 2008 Retrospective analysis 30 FMs and an offline imaging protocol are effective in reducing systematic errors
Utilization of CBCT for reconstruction of dose distribution delivered in IGRT of prostate carcinoma—bony landmark setup compared with FM setup Paluska et al11 2013 Retrospective analysis 59 PTV margin reduction is feasible using FMs for image guidance
Analysis of FM-based position verification in EBRT of patients with PCa Van der Heide et al12 2007 Retrospective analysis 453 FMs are stable. Identified time trends in prostate motion
Prostate motion Intrafraction motion of the prostate during EBRT: analysis of 427 patients with implanted FMs Kotte et al13 2007 Retrospective analysis 427 Frequent prostate motion observed during EBRT, which can be encompassed with a 2-mm margin
IMRT using implanted FMs with daily portal imaging: assessment of prostate organ motion Chen et al14 2007 Retrospective analysis 33 Prostate motion is significant. Daily imaging with FMs is necessary for the reduction of margins
Intrafraction prostate displacement in radiotherapy estimated from pre- and post-treatment imaging of patients with implanted FMs Kron et al15 2010 Retrospective analysis 184 Prostate motion is a limiting factor when considering margins for radiotherapy
Intrafraction motion during extreme hypofractionated radiotherapy of the prostate using pre- and post-treatment imaging Quon et al16 2012 Phase I/II trial 53 Prostate displacements during hypofractionated radiotherapy are comparable with intrafraction conventionally fractionated treatments
Intrafractional motion of the prostate during hypofractionated radiotherapy Xie et al17 2008 Retrospective analysis 21 With monitoring and intervention prostate motion within the range of the Cyberknife tracking range; however, there is significant variation between patients
Deformation of prostate and SVs relative to intraprostatic FMs Van der Weilen et al18 2008 Prospective clinical study 21 With respect to FMs, prostate deformation is small, SV deformation considerable
An MRI study of prostate deformation relative to implanted gold FMs Nichol et al21 2007 Prospective clinical study 25 During radiotherapy, FMs in-migrated and prostate volume decreased. Patients undergoing TURP demonstrated greater deformation than those not undergoing TURP
  Hybrid registration of prostate and SVs for IGRT De Boer et al19 2013 Retrospective analysis 20 Substantial differences observed between SV and prostate orientations
Margin evaluation in the presence of deformation, rotation and translation in prostate and entire SV irradiation with daily marker-based setup corrections Mutanga et al20 2011 Retrospective study 21 PTV margins based on FM, prostate 5 mm and >8 mm for SVs. Correction of rotational errors of little benefit
Implantation Technique for implantation of FMs in the prostate Shinohara and Roach22 2008 Retrospective study 705 TRUS-guided FM implantation is well tolerated. Experience provides a guide for clinicians
Technique of outpatient placement of intraprostatic FMs before EBRT Linden et al23 2009 Retrospective study 98 TRUS-guided FM implantation is safe and efficacious
Implantation of FMs for image guidance in prostate radiotherapy: patient-reported toxicity Igdem et al24 2009 Prospective clinical study 177 TRUS-guided FM implantation is safe and well tolerated
Patient-reported complications from FM implantation for prostate IGRT Gill et al26 2012 Retrospective study (questionnaires) 234 TRUS-guided FM insertion for IGRT is well tolerated in the majority of patients with PCa
Is periprostatic nerve block a gold standard in case of TRUS-guided prostate biopsy? Kumar et al27 2013 Prospective randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled study 150 Periprostatic nerve block provides better pain control in TRUS-guided prostate biopsy, but still there is need of additional analgesic in the form of tramadol or INB. Tramadol has advantage of oral intake and analgesic effect at time of probe insertion and at nerve block. Both tramadol and INB may be used in combination along with PNB
Ultrasound-guided TR implantation of gold markers for prostate localization during EBRT: complication rate and risk factors Langenhuijsen et al28 2007 Retrospective analysis 209 TR gold marker implantation well tolerated. Moderate complication rate influenced by disease stage, ADT and age
Single-centre experience in prostate fiducial placement: technique and mid-term follow-up Kably et al30 2014 Retrospective analysis 75 TR ultrasound guidance of FMs is feasible, well tolerated and safe
Long-term experience with TR and TP implantations of gold FMs in the prostate for position verification in EBRT; feasibility, toxicity and quality of life Moman et al33 2010 Retrospective analysis 914 Clinical use of TP-implanted gold FMs for position verification in EBRT for PCa is a feasible and safe procedure without influencing patient quality of life
Infections after FM implantation for prostate radiotherapy: are we underestimating the risks? Loh et al31 2015 Retrospective analysis 285 Overall rate of symptomatic infection with FM implantation is higher than other FM series at 7.7%. This is in keeping with prostate biopsy reports of infection
Number and type of FM Improving positioning in high-dose radiotherapy for PCa: safety and visibility of frequently used gold FMs Fonteyne et al35 2012 Prospective RCT 25 Stability and visibility of five different types of marker was proven. Larger markers facilitate automatic image fusion; however; they generate more scatter than smaller markers
Feasibility, detectability and experience with platinum seed internal FMs for CT–MRI fusion and real-time tumour tracking during SABR Janardanan et al38 2012 Retrospective study 29 Platinum seeds provide superior contrast to gold seeds on MR images and a better choice for CT–MRI fusion
Clinical results from first use of prostate stent as FM for radiotherapy of PCa Carl et al44 2011 Prospective clinical study 62 Ni–Ti stents have potential as new prostate FM
Influence of the number of elongated FMs on the localization accuracy of the prostate De Boer et al42 2012 Retrospective study 24 Two elongated markers placed at either side of the prostate can be used to accurately localize the prostate for IGRT
Multi-institutional clinical experience with the Calypso system in localization and continuous, real-time monitoring of the prostate gland during external radiotherapy Kupelian et al46 2007 Prospective clinical study 41 Using three implanted electromagnetic transponders provides clinically efficient, accurate and objective localization of the prostate
Patient positioning based on a radioactive tracer implanted in patients with localized PCa: a performance and safety evaluation De Kruijf et al48 2013 Prospective single-arm multi-institutional study 20 Implantation of the tracer is safe and feasible and patients can be positioned and monitored accurately using RealEye
Migration (Non)-migration of radiopaque markers used for online localization of the prostate with an EPI device Pouliot et al29 2003 Retrospective analysis 10 None of the markers studied migrated significantly. The use of three markers provides a tool to monitor prostate position and volume changes that can occur over time owing to hormone or radiation therapy
Marker seed migration in prostate localization Poggi et al49 2003 Prospective clinical study 9 Negligible seed migration over the course of radiotherapy
Intraprostatic fiducials for localization of the prostate gland: monitoring IMDs during radiation therapy to test for marker stability Kupelian et al50 2005 Retrospective analysis 56 Seed migration within the prostate during a course of radiotherapy is negligible. Prostate deformation rather than true migration results in observed marker position variations
Migration of intraprostatic FMs and its influence on the matching quality in EBRT for PCa Delouya et al51 2010 Retrospective analysis 31 Average daily seed migration is often negligible. Migration >2 mm from planning to first treatment may require adjustment of PTV margin to account for this
Impact of concurrent androgen deprivation on FM migration in EBRT for PCa Tiberi et al52 2012 Retrospective analysis 37 A delay between the start of ADT and the start of EBRT; prostate involution has little or no effect on FM positioning within the gland. <1% of treatments studied demonstrated significant marker migration
Imaging modality used IGRT for PCa comparing kV imaging of FMs with CBCT Barney et al56 2011 Retrospective study 36 Target verification for CBCT and kV imaging using FMs are similar; however, over 25% of shifts differed enough to affect target coverage
EPI vs kV imaging in FM IGRT for PCa: an analysis of setup uncertainties Gill et al41 2012 Prospective 333 Suggests a larger CTV–PTV margin is used in EPI-based IGRT for PCa
Method comparison of ultrasound and kV X-ray FM imaging for prostate radiotherapy targeting Fuller et al61 2006 Prospective non-randomized study 40 Significant differences in ultrasound and FM IG setup data. Data between ultrasound and FM imaging not interchangeable
Study of ExacTrac X-ray 6D IGRT setup uncertainty for marker-based prostate IMRT treatment Shi et al60 2012 Retrospective study 43 Overall interfraction mean error of 2 mm or less for 3D translations and 0.25° rotation, facilitating margin reduction
Comparison of daily MV EPI or kV imaging with marker seeds with ultrasound imaging or skin marks for prostate localization and treatment positioning in patients with PCa Serago et al43 2006 Retrospective study 35 MV and kV EPI similar in terms of accuracy and superior to ultrasound
Comparison of ultrasound and implanted seed marker prostate localization methods: implications for IGRT Scarbrough et al62 2006 Retrospective analysis 40 Ultrasound and FM setup data differ significantly, resulting in different PTV margins. More variation is seen in ultrasound data
Comparison of TAUS and electromagnetic transponders for prostate localization Foster et al63 2010 Retrospective analysis 41 Ultrasound and electromagnetic transponder setup data differ significantly. Ultrasound-derived PTV margins 3–4 times smaller than Calypso data
Clinical impact Individualized PTVs for intrafraction motion during hypofractionated IMRT boost for PCa Cheung et al64 2005 Prospective clinical study 33 Acute toxicity using IMRT for hypofractionated boost was acceptable. Grade 3 urinary toxicity may be increased compared with standard fractionation
PTV margins for prostate radiotherapy using daily EPI and implanted FMs Skarsgard et al65 2010 Prospective Phase I/II study 46 Daily image guidance with FMs allows significant reduction of PTV margin, facilitating dose escalation which may improve outcomes for patients with PCa
Does IGRT improve toxicity profile in whole pelvic-treated high-risk PCa? Chung et al68 2009 Prospective study 25 Rectal and bladder toxicity consistently lower for FM-guided radiotherapy group than that for non-FM-guided radiotherapy. This is likely attributable to reduced PTV margins in the FM-guided group
Treatment-related morbidity in PCa: a comparison of 3D conformal radiation therapy with and without image guidance using implanted FMs Singh et al69 2013 Retrospective study 282 A significant reduction in bowel dysfunctional symptoms reported by the IGRT group vs the non-IGRT group
Treatment outcome of high-dose IG-IMRT using intraprostate FMs for localized PCa at a single institute in Japan Takeda et al67 2012 Retrospective study 141 High-dose FM-guided IMRT well tolerated
Late toxicity and biochemical control in 554 patients with PCa treated with and without dose-escalated IGRT Kok et al71 2013 Retrospective study 186 FM-guided IGRT associated with a reduction in late urinary toxicity and improved biochemical tumour control. Further studies required
Improvement in toxicity in patients at high risk of PCa treated with IG-IMRT compared with 3D conformal radiotherapy without daily image guidance Sveistrup et al72 2014 Retrospective study 311 FM-IGRT can be an effective method of reducing GI and GU toxicity when treating PCa

3D, three-dimensional; ADT, androgen deprivation therapy; CBCT, cone-beam CT; CTV, clinical target volume; EBRT, external beam radiotherapy; EPI, electronic portal imaging; EPID, electronic portal imaging device; FM, fiducial marker; GI, gastrointestinal; GU, genitourinary; IG, image-guided; IG-IMRT, image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy; IGRT, image-guided radiotherapy; IMD, intermarker distance; IMRT, intensity-modulated radiotherapy; INB, intraprostatic nerve block; kV, kilovoltage; MV, megavoltage; PCa, prostate cancer; PNB, periprostatic nerve block; PTV, planning target volume; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SABR, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy; SV, seminal vesicle; TAUS, transabdominal ultrasound; TP, transperineal; TR, transrectal; TRUS, transrectal ultrasound; TURP, transurethral resection of the prostate.