Table 1. Folding parameters for aptamer docking of wt and apoASTAB obtained by smFRET.
Variant | Mg [mM] | Ade [μM] | ΔG(UD) Hista [kcal/mol] | kdockb [s−1] | kundockb [s−1] | ΔGdockKinc [kcal/mol] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wt | 2 | 0 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.98 ± 0.03 | 0.2 ± 0.1 |
20 | 0 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.18 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | |
2 | 100 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | |
apoASTAB | 2 | 0 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 |
20 | 0 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | |
2 | 100 | 0.0 ± 0.1 | 0.49 ± 0.04 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.1 |
aFree enthalpy of the docked state relative to the undocked state determined from the FRET distribution observed in the FRET histogram as ΔG(UD) = –RT*ln(D/U). The reported error was calculated from the fitting errors of the FRET populations by Gaussian error propagation.
bThe reported rate constants are mean values with standard deviations from single-exponentially fitted dwell-time histograms of two independent experiments.
cFree docking enthalpy determined from the observable kinetics as ΔGdock = –RT*ln(kdock/kundock). The reported error was calculated from the standard deviations of the rate constants from two independent experiments by Gaussian error propagation.