Table 1.
Study | Time of Testing | N (SzS/HC) | Pitch MMN Reduction | Duration MMN Reduction | IQ or Education Controlled | Effect Size at Fz/Fcz (Cohen’s d) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tested < 1-y FH | Pitch | Dur. | |||||
Salisbury et al6,a | <1-y FH | 21/27 | N | Y | 0.09 | ||
Oknina et al7 | At FH | 25/14 | N | Y | |||
Oades et al8,b | At FH | 28/22 | Y | N | 1.0 | ||
Umbricht et al9,c | <6-mo FH | 26/39 | N | N | N | 0.33 | 0.25 |
(College subsample)c | <6-mo FH | 12/39 | N | N | Y | −0.10 | −0.42 |
(No college subsample)c | <6-mo FH | 14/39 | Y | Y | N | 0.67 | 0.96 |
Salisbury et al10,a | <6-mo FH | 20/32 | N | Y | −0.008 | ||
Devrim-Üçok et al11 | At FH | 30/34 | N | Y | 0.0 | ||
Magno et al12 | <3-mo FH | 12/27 | N | N | U | −0.36 | −0.24 |
Kaur et al13,d | <1-y FE | 18/18 | Y | N | 1.47 | ||
Bodatsch et al14 | At FE | 33/67 | N | Y | U | 0.11 | 0.45 |
Hsieh et al15 | <1-y FE | 32/56 | Y | N | 0.50 | ||
Mondragón-Maya et al16,f | At FH | 20/23 | N | Y | 0.17 | ||
Nagai et al17 | <1-y FE | 20/22 | T | Y | Y | 0.34 | 0.80 |
Tested < 2-y FH | |||||||
Kaur et al18,d | First or second episode | 20/20 | Y | N | 1.40 | ||
Higuchi et al19,e | <2-y FH | 20/20 | Y | U | 1.60 | ||
Higuchi et al20,e | <2-y FH | 19/19 | Y | U | 1.20 | ||
Solís-Vivanco et al21,f | <2-y FH | 20/23 | Y | Y | 1.14 |
Note: FE, first episode; FH, first hospitalization; HC, healthy controls; IQ, intelligence quotient; MMN, mismatch negativity; SzS, schizophrenia spectrum; Y, yes; N, no; T, trend level; U, unreported. Effect sizes: pitch, pitch MMN (left side); dur., duration MMN (right side). Negative values indicate patient samples had larger responses than healthy subjects.
a–eStudies with matching superscripts present data from overlapping samples. Caution should be used to avoid “double weighting” effect sizes.
cUmbricht et al performed secondary analyses based on whether FHSz had or had not attended college. Note the strong effect on group differences.
fSubject overlap between studies is unclear.