Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 19;7(5):335. doi: 10.1007/s13205-017-0978-0

Table 1.

Comparison of biochemical properties among different samples

Items/samples NS1.1 NS1.2 NS1.3 OS1.1 OS1.2 OS1.3
pH* 6.25 ± 0.1 6.50 ± 0.2 6.88 ± 0.1 4.50 ± 0.2 4.68 ± 0.1 4.49 ± 0.1
Moisture (%) 37.81 ± 3.4 38.02 ± 2.9 38.12 ± 2.6 37.66 ± 1.3 38.14 ± 2.5 38.25 ± 4.2
Humus (%)* 21.05 ± 1.5 23.88 ± 1.3 24.41 ± 2.1 30.15 ± 2.6 33.10 ± 3.1 29.84 ± 0.8
NH4 + (mg/kg)* 183.1 ± 1.3 180.8 ± 1.9 170.6 ± 0.8 129.2 ± 2.4 130.8 ± 3.2 131.1 ± 1.5
AP (mg/kg)* 191.2 ± 9.6 205.3 ± 10.5 214.5 ± 12.3 825.0 ± 32.1 846.1 ± 64.5 802.4 ± 57.8
Available K+ (mg/kg)* 112.5 ± 3.2 102.4 ± 1.5 107.8 ± 2.6 59.8 ± 0.8 60.1 ± 1.2 62.5 ± 0.7

All data are presented as mean ± standard deviations (n = 3)

AP available phosphorus

* Significant differences in a row between NS1 and OS1 as determined by ANOVA (P < 0.05)