. 2017 Sep 15;8:1532. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01532

Table 5.

Structural equation models results.

T.I.E. (M. A)	Model B						Model C
D.E.	β	P.E.	t-value	Percentile 95%		Sup.	β	P.E.	t-value	Percentile 95%		Sup.
				Lower	Upper					Lower	Upper
TET. O. P.	0.5723^***		8.3753	0.4439	0.7151	Yes	0.5723^***		8.3753	0.4439	0.7151	Yes
H1	−0.0836^ns		0.6174	−0.3278	0.2025	Not	0.0137^ns		0.2048	−0.1248	0.1446	Not
TIT. O. P.		0,6164		0.4659	0.7522	Yes		0.5020		0.3724	0.6214	Yes
H2		0.6164		0.4659	0.7522	Yes		0.2500		0.1282	0.3863	Yes
H2a	0.7737^***		21.4803	0.7003	0.8416	Yes	0.7538^***		16.9407	0.6583	0.8335	Yes
H2b	0.7967^***		7.8783	0.5721	0.9753	Yes	0.3317^***		3.7760	0.1676	0.5083	Yes
H3								-0,1075		−0.2475	0.0690	Not
H3a							−0.1718^ns		1.3211	−0.4038	0.1095	Not
H3b							0.6255^***		13.5622	0.5291	0.7101	Yes
H4								0.3594		0.2611	0.4497	Yes
H4a							0.7622^***		8.5545	0.5549	0.9047	Yes

Causal relationships: total, direct and indirect effects. T.I.E. (M. A), Total and Indirect Effects/mediation hypotheses (Model A); D.E., Direct Effects (Hypothesis H1 and Sub-hypotheses); β, path coefficient; P.E., Point Estimate; Sup, Supported; TET. O.P., Total Effect of Training on Organizational Performance; TIT. O.P., Total Indirect Effect of Training on Organizational Performance; ACAP, Absorptive capacity.

^***

p < 0.001; ns Not significant [based on t_{(4, 999)}, one-tailed test].

t_{(0.05, 4, 999)} = 1.645158499, t_{(0.01, 4, 999)} = 2.327094067, t_{(0.001, 4, 999)} = 3.091863446.