Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 19;7:11873. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11847-0

Table 3.

Effect of amphotericin B formulations on hepatic and renal parameters.

Amphotericin B Formulations Dose (mg/kg) ALTa (IU/L) ASTa (IU/L) BUNa (mmol/L) Creatinine (μmol/L)
Controlb 0 149.8 ± 14.8 18.0 ± 2.0 5.4 ± 2.6 35.5 ± 1.02
AmB-NA3 1 148.3 ± 22.8 19.3 ± 1.9 5.8 ± 0.3 37.5 ± 0.06
5 161.2 ± 8.4 17.3 ± 1.7 6.2 ± 1.9 39.3 ± 1.71
10 154.0 ± 29.4 20.6 ± 7.0 5.5 ± 2.6 42.5 ± 1.00
15 350.0 ± 2.4* 31.8 ± 5.7* 8.8 ± 2.3* 58.5 ± 1.49*
AmB-NA5 1 146.3 ± 2.8 17.3 ± 1.1 5.8 ± 1.3 39.5 ± 1.60
5 162.8 ± 19.2 18.8 ± 4.5 6.0 ± 1.2 36.6 ± 1.52
10 167.1 ± 8.4 19.3 ± 2.7 6.2 ± 1.9 40.0 ± 1.87
15 335.0 ± 8.4* 27.8 ± 2.4* 8.3 ± 1.3* 56.5 ± 1.91*
Fungizone 2 704.0 ± 27.6* 49.0 ± 2.2* 16.2 ± 0.2* 88.7 ± 2.22*
AmBisome 10 205.2 ± 14.3* 24.8 ± 3.8* 5.7 ± 1.0 46.3 ± 3.14

The two commercial formulations of Amphotericin B, Fungizone and AmBisome, were used at dose of 2 and 10 mg/kg, respectively.The new formulations (AmB-NA3 and AmB-NA5) were used in a range of concentrations (1–15 mg/kg). Values are mean ± SD.

*Significant at P < 0.05compared with the results for the respective control mice, Student’s t test.

aALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen.

bControl mice were given only PBS.