Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 20.
Published in final edited form as: Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2017 Jun;82(2):13–30. doi: 10.1111/mono.12296

Table 2.

Sociodemographic characteristics of hypothetical convenience samples, by SES, ethnicity, and type of convenience sample

SES

Low Medium High
Ethnicity
a) Conventional convenience samples
 Black 30% White/70% Black M SES = −1.5 (−2.5|2.5) 25% White/75% Black M SES = 0.0 (−2.5|2.5) 15% White/85% Black M SES = 1.5 (−2.5|2.5)
 White 90% White/10% Black M SES = −1.5 (−2.5|2.5) 92% White/8% Black M SES = 0.0 (−2.5|2.5) 88% White/12% Black M SES = 1.5 (−2.5|2.5)

b) Homogeneous convenience samples
 Black 0% White/100% Black M SES = −1.5 (<−1.0) 0% White/100% Black M SES = 0 (≥ −1.0 and ≤ 1.0) 0% White/100% Black M SES = 1.5 (> 1.0)
 White 100% White/0% Black M SES = −1.5 (<−1.0) 100% White/0% Black M SES = 0 (≥ −1.0 and ≤ 1.0) 100% White/0% Black M SES = 1.5 (> 1.0)

Note: For each conventional convenience sample, participants from all levels of SES are represented to some extent. For example, among the Low SES conventional convenience samples, although the average SES is −1.5, there are some participants with Medium (≥ −1.0 and ≤ 1.0) and High SES (> 1.0) as well. For each homogeneous convenience sample, participants from only a single level of SES are represented. For example, among the Low SES homogeneous convenience samples, the samples are limited to those with Low SES (<−1.0).