Table 2.
Sociodemographic characteristics of hypothetical convenience samples, by SES, ethnicity, and type of convenience sample
| SES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Low | Medium | High | |
| Ethnicity | |||
| a) Conventional convenience samples | |||
| Black | 30% White/70% Black M SES = −1.5 (−2.5|2.5) | 25% White/75% Black M SES = 0.0 (−2.5|2.5) | 15% White/85% Black M SES = 1.5 (−2.5|2.5) |
| White | 90% White/10% Black M SES = −1.5 (−2.5|2.5) | 92% White/8% Black M SES = 0.0 (−2.5|2.5) | 88% White/12% Black M SES = 1.5 (−2.5|2.5) |
|
| |||
| b) Homogeneous convenience samples | |||
| Black | 0% White/100% Black M SES = −1.5 (<−1.0) | 0% White/100% Black M SES = 0 (≥ −1.0 and ≤ 1.0) | 0% White/100% Black M SES = 1.5 (> 1.0) |
| White | 100% White/0% Black M SES = −1.5 (<−1.0) | 100% White/0% Black M SES = 0 (≥ −1.0 and ≤ 1.0) | 100% White/0% Black M SES = 1.5 (> 1.0) |
Note: For each conventional convenience sample, participants from all levels of SES are represented to some extent. For example, among the Low SES conventional convenience samples, although the average SES is −1.5, there are some participants with Medium (≥ −1.0 and ≤ 1.0) and High SES (> 1.0) as well. For each homogeneous convenience sample, participants from only a single level of SES are represented. For example, among the Low SES homogeneous convenience samples, the samples are limited to those with Low SES (<−1.0).