. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 20.

Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Jun 4;45(10):2108–2124. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0509-z

Table 2.

Wave 1 dyad and adolescent Unique perspectives of parental rejection predicting Wave 2 adolescent internalizing and externalizing

	Adolescent self-report				A-M-F Family Factor

	W2 Internalizing		W2 Externalizing		W2 Internalizing		W2 Externalizing
	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2
W1 A-M Dyad Perspective	.07	−.04	.17^**	.04	.31^(.24)^	−.03(−.03)	.35^(.32)^	−.02(−.01)
W1 A-F Dyad Perspective	.07	−.04	.17^**	.04	.31^(.24)^	−.03(−.03)	.35^(.32)^	−.02(−.01)
W1 Adolescent Unique Perspective	.53^**	.25^**	.42^**	.20^*	.20^(.37)^	−.02(.10)	.21^(.19)^	−.01(.00)
W1 Stability	--	.53^**	--	.51^**	--	.89^(.73)^	--	.93^(.77)^

Note. All estimates are standardized. All estimates control for adolescent age, gender, and race/ethnicity, as well as family structure and family SES. A = adolescent; M = mother; F = father. W1 = Wave 1; W2 = Wave 2. The estimates in parentheses are based on analyses using family mean scores (i.e., the mean of adolescent, mother, and father reports) of adolescent adjustment.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.