Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 15;44(13):6570–6578. doi: 10.1002/2017GL073970

Table 1.

Summary of Pit Occurrence in Well‐Preserved Impact Cratersa

Parent Crater Latitude Longitude Depth (km) Diameter (km) Pits? Max Pit Diameter (m) Approx. Crater Age (ma) Pit Setting
Urvara −45.66 249.24 5 to 6 170 degraded 2054.8 130–240 (−8/+20) Ma smooth floor
Dantu 24.3 138.23 ~4 126 abundant 1102.8 72–150 (−4/+9) Ma smooth floor and ejecta
Occator 19.82 239.33 ~4 92 few, ambiguous 21 (±0.4) Ma wall terrace and ejecta
Ikapati 33.8 45.61 ~4 50 abundant 866.5 19–43 (−2/+10) Ma smooth floor and ejecta
Azacca −6.66 218.4 ~2.5 49 few, degraded 742.1 76 (±10) Ma smooth floor
Haulani 5.8 10.77 2.5 to 3 34 abundant 372.9 1.7–2.7 (−0.2/+0.7) smooth floor
Kupalo −39.44 173.2 ~2.5 26 abundant 326.2 <4.5 Ma (difficult to date) smooth floor
Juling −35.9 168.48 ~1.75 20 none <2.5 Ma (difficult to date)
Oxo 42.21 359.6 <1 10 none 0.51 (±0.2) Ma
a

Crater age estimates are based on the Lunar Derived System (LDM) and are discussed in detail by Schmedemann et al. [2017] and Williams et al. [2017]. Pit diameters are determined via the technique described by Kneissl et al. [2011].