Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 9;7(18):7347–7361. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3251

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Predicted effects of (a) annual mean temperature (AMT); (b) prey detection ranges (PDR); (c) atmospheric attenuation (AA); (d) relative humidity (RH); (e) sexual dimorphism and (f) region on RF variation in Rhinolophus damarensis. The gray‐shaded areas and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals