Table 2.
Results from linear mixed‐effects models (LMEs) testing for association between the resting frequency of Rhinolophus damarensis and environmental variables
| Model | K | AICc | Delta_AICc | ModelLik | AICcWt | LL | Cum.wt | ER |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reg + AMT + Sex | 6 | 295.89 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.535 | −141.52 | 0.535 | |
| Reg + AMT + Sex + FA | 7 | 298.11 | 2.218 | 0.330 | 0.176 | −141.48 | 0.712 | 3.03 |
| Lat + AMT + Sex | 6 | 300.37 | 4.476 | 0.107 | 0.057 | −143.76 | 0.769 | 8.93 |
| Reg + PDR + Sex | 6 | 300.85 | 4.956 | 0.084 | 0.045 | −144.10 | 0.814 | 11.91 |
| Reg + AA + Sex | 6 | 301.16 | 5.271 | 0.072 | 0.038 | −144.16 | 0.852 | 13.95 |
| Sex | 4 | 302.58 | 6.690 | 0.035 | 0.019 | −147.09 | 0.879 | 28.1 |
| Lat + AMT + Sex + FA | 7 | 302.66 | 6.769 | 0.034 | 0.018 | −143.76 | 0.889 | 28.37 |
| Reg + PDR + Sex + FA | 7 | 303.13 | 7.236 | 0.027 | 0.014 | −143.99 | 0.903 | 37.26 |
| Reg + AA + Sex + FA | 7 | 303.44 | 7.545 | 0.023 | 0.012 | −144.15 | 0.916 | 43.49 |
| AMT + Sex | 5 | 303.79 | 7.897 | 0.019 | 0.010 | −146.6 | 0.926 | 51.87 |
| Lat + PDR + Sex | 6 | 304.08 | 8.186 | 0.017 | 0.009 | −145.62 | 0.935 | 58.04 |
| Lat + AA + Sex | 6 | 304.09 | 8.195 | 0.017 | 0.009 | −145.62 | 0.944 | 58.15 |
| PDR + Sex | 5 | 304.14 | 8.245 | 0.016 | 0.009 | −146.77 | 0.952 | 61.7 |
| AA + Sex | 5 | 304.34 | 8.443 | 0.015 | 0.008 | −146.87 | 0.960 | 68.13 |
| Lat + RH + Sex | 6 | 304.43 | 8.539 | 0.014 | 0.007 | −145.79 | 0.968 | 69.02 |
| RH + Sex | 5 | 304.63 | 8.739 | 0.013 | 0.007 | −147.02 | 0.975 | 79 |
| Reg + RH + Sex | 6 | 305.29 | 9.392 | 0.009 | 0.005 | −146.22 | 0.979 | >100 |
| AMT + Sex + FA | 6 | 306.04 | 10.144 | 0.006 | 0.003 | −146.59 | 0.983 | >100 |
| Lat + PDR + Sex + FA | 7 | 306.37 | 10.480 | 0.005 | 0.003 | −145.62 | 0.986 | >100 |
| Lat + AA + Sex + FA | 7 | 306.38 | 10.489 | 0.005 | 0.003 | −145.62 | 0.988 | >100 |
| PDR + Sex + FA | 6 | 306.39 | 10.491 | 0.005 | 0.003 | −146.77 | 0.991 | >100 |
| AA + Sex + FA | 6 | 306.58 | 10.690 | 0.005 | 0.003 | −146.87 | 0.994 | >100 |
| Lat + RH + Sex + FA | 7 | 306.72 | 10.827 | 0.004 | 0.002 | −145.79 | 0.996 | >100 |
| RH + Sex + FA | 6 | 306.88 | 10.984 | 0.004 | 0.002 | −147.01 | 0.998 | >100 |
| Reg + RH + Sex + FA | 7 | 307.58 | 11.686 | 0.003 | 0.002 | −146.22 | 1.000 | >100 |
| Reg + AMT | 5 | 318.52 | 22.623 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −153.96 | 1.000 | >100 |
| Lat + AMT | 5 | 319.52 | 23.623 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −154.46 | 1.000 | >100 |
| FA | 4 | 320.32 | 24.426 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −155.96 | 1.000 | >100 |
| Reg + PDR | 5 | 321.04 | 25.144 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −155.22 | 1.000 | >100 |
| Reg + AA | 5 | 321.62 | 25.723 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −155.51 | 1.000 | >100 |
| Lat | 4 | 322.61 | 26.714 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −157.11 | 1.000 | >100 |
| Reg | 4 | 322.95 | 27.061 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −157.28 | 1.000 | >100 |
| Lat + PDR | 5 | 323.16 | 27.264 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −156.28 | 1.000 | >100 |
| Lat + AA | 5 | 323.23 | 27.340 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −156.32 | 1.000 | >100 |
| Lat + RH | 5 | 323.59 | 27.692 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −156.49 | 1.000 | >100 |
| AMT | 4 | 324.09 | 28.193 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −157.85 | 1.000 | >100 |
| PDR | 4 | 324.21 | 28.313 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −157.91 | 1.000 | >100 |
| AA | 4 | 324.42 | 28.523 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −158.01 | 1.000 | >100 |
| RH | 4 | 324.64 | 28.746 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −158.12 | 1.000 | >100 |
| Reg + RH | 5 | 325.08 | 29.186 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −157.24 | 1.000 | >100 |
AICc, Akaike information criterion scores; ΔAICc, change in AICc relative to the highest ranked model; AICwt, Akaike information criterion weight; AMT, Annual mean temperature; Cum.wt, cumulative weight; ER, evidence ratio; FA, forearm; K, number of parameters; Lat, latitude; LL, log‐likelihood; Reg, region; RH, relative humidity. Values for the strongest model are given in bold font at the top of the table.