Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 22;20(5):539–552. doi: 10.1007/s11102-017-0815-9

Table 1.

Study characteristics

Author (year) Study design Main in- and exclusion criteria Sample size endoscopic patients Age in years mean (SD)/median (range) Number female (%) Tumor subtypes Tumor size Gross total resection
Studies reporting both visual acuity and visual field deficit
 Bokhari (2013) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PA, fully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (1998–2010) 79 Mean age: 56.7 (SD: 16.3) 44 (56%) NF 39 (49%), PRL 16 (20%), GH 19 (24%), ACTH 4 (5), TSH 1 (1) NS 50 (63%)
 Campbell (2010) Retrospective case series Inclusion: GH producing adenomas (2005–2009) 26 Mean age: 45.7 (–) 12 (46%) GH (100%) 84.6% ≥10 mm: 84.6% 26 (73%)
 Chabot (2015) Retrospective case series Inclusion: adenoma size >3 cm (2009–2014) 39 Median age: 56.3 (SD: 15.6) 14 (40%) NS >4 cm: 15.6% NS
 Juraschka (2014) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PA patients (2006–2012) maximum tumor diameter in any plane ≥3 cm, and tumor volume ≥10 cm3. Exclusion: lack of suprasellar growth 73 Mean: 55 (SD: 15) 23 (32%) NF 65 (89%) functioning 6 (8.2%), unknown: 2 (2.8%) Mean: 4.09 cm 73 (24%)
 Karppinen (2015) Retrospective case series Inclusion: NFPA patients (2000–2011) endoscopic and transnasal. Exclusion: craniectomy, re-resection, hormonally active adenomas and pituitary carcinoma 41/185 58.5 (SD: 16) 18 (44%) NF 185 (100%) Mean: 27 (SD: 9) 23 (41%)
 Yildrim (2016) Retrospective case series Inclusion: NFPA pure endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal technique (2009–2014) 160 Mean age 49 (–) 72 (45%) NF: 160 (100%) Mean: 2.48 cm (–) 160 (90%)
Studies only reporting visual acuity
 Constantino (2016) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PAs with diameter >3 cm (2010–2014) 28 Mean age: 46 (–) 11 (40%) NS Mean: 4.6 cm (–) 28 (14%)
 De Witte (2011) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PA resected endoscopic transsphenoidal (2007–2010) 83 Mean age: 50 (–) 39 (47%) NF 40 (48.3%), PRL 6 (7.2%), GH 6 (7.2%), ACTH 3 (3.6%), TSH 1 (1.2%), mixed 17 (20.5%) 73 Macroadenomas 83 (30%)
 Fan (2014) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PA resections (2005–2010) 28 Median age: 43 (–) 17 (60%) NF 17 (60.1), PRL 5 (17.9%), GH 3 (10.7%), ACTH 2 (7.2%) mixed: 1 (3.6%) 25 >1 cm 28 (57%)
Studies only reporting visual field deficit
 Anik (2011) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PA with visual field deficits. Exclusion: comorbidity that can influence vision (2009–2010) 72 Mean age: 45.7 (SD: 10.9) 43 (57%) NF 42 (58.3), PRL 6 (8.3%), GH 22 (30.5%), ACTH 2 (2.8%) NS NS
 Akin (2016) Retrospective case series Inclusion: prolactinomas reected endonasally (2006–2012) 142 Mean age: 35.5 (SD: 13.3) 76 (54%) PRL 142 (100%) 113 Macroadenomas, 10 giant adenomas NS
 Cappabianca (1999) Retrospective case series Inclusion: pituitary adenoma, microscopic (1996) endoscopic (1997) 10/30 Range: 33–67 4 (40%) NF 5 (50%), GH 5 (50%) 7 Microadenomas 9 (90%)
 Chi (2013) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PA with endonasal extension (2011–2012) 80 Mean age: 51 (–) 35 (44%) NF 24 (30%), PRL 26 (32.5%), GH 9 (11.3%), ACTH 3 (3.8%), TSH 3 (3.8%), mixed 5 (6.3%) 16 Microadenomas 80 (64%)
 Cho (2002) Retrospective case series Inclusion: cohort of endoscopic and sublabial resection of prolactinomas (1996–2000) 22/44 Mean age: 45 (–) 22 (100%) PRL 22 (100%) NS NS
 Dallapiazza (2015) Retrospective case series Inclusion: NFPA patients with >5 year follow-up 80 Mean age: 57 (SD: 13) 42 (53%) NF 80 (100%) 31 > 3.0 cm 80 (71%)
 Dehdashti (2008) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PA patients, purely endoscopic endonasal operation (2004–2007). Exlcusion: very large pituitary adenomas and extended approaches 200 Mean age 50 (–) 109 (55%) NF 111 (55.5%), PRL 25 (12.5%), GH 34 (17%), ACTH 27 (13.5), TSH 3 (1.5) NS 182 (97%)
 D’Haens (2009) Retrospective case series Inclusion: pituitary adenoma resected microscopic (1995–2001), endoscopic (2001–2007) 60/120 Mean age 37 (–) 41 (68%) PRL 29 (48%), GH 13 (23%), ACTH 16 (27%), TSH 2 (3%) NS NS
 Leach (2010) Retrospective case series Inclusion: sellar lesions (2005–2007) operated endoscopically 89/125 NS NS NF 67 (54%), PRL 9 (7%), GH 22 (18%), ACTH 10 (8%), craniopharyngioma 4 (3%), Other 7 (6%) NS NS
 Minet (2008) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PA with >6 month follow-up (2003–2005) 31/71 Mean age: 51.4 (17.2) (endonasal) 14 (45%) (endonasal) NF 27 (87%) PRL 2 (7%), TSH: 1 3 (%), GH: 1 (3%) NS NS
 Nakao (2011) Retrospective case series Inclusion: giant NFPA endonasal resection (2000–2008) 43 Mean age: 55 (–) 20 (47%) NF 43 Mean diameter: 47.8 mm (SD 1.2) 20 (47%)
 Paluzzi (2014) Retrospective case series Inclusion: purely endoscopic operated PA patients (2002–2011) 555 NS NF 360 (69.2), PRL 53 (10%), GH 49 (10%), ACTH 58 (11%) 89.4% >1 cm 359 (65%)
 Sheehan (1999) Retrospective case series Inclusion: NFPA endonasal resection (1995–1997) 26/70 Mean age: 59.2 (SD: 15.1) 8 (31%) NS Volume: 11.0 (SD: 6.9) cm3 NS
Studies reporting unspecified visual function
 Chohan (2016) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PAs with size >10 cm3 or cross sectional length >4 cm (2003–2014) 62 Mean age 54 (–) 27 (44%) NS Median volume: 13.74 cm3 62 (47%)
 Cusimano (2012) Retrospective case series Inclusion: giant pituitary adenomas (>10 cm3) resected endoscopically or by craniotomy or microscopically (1994–2001) 29/72 Mean age 50 (SD: 15) 13 (45%) NF 25 (83%), functioning 4 (17%) Mean: 4.0 cm 26 (91%)
 Gondim (2014) Retrospective case series Inclusion: giant pituitary adenomas >4 cm (1998–2011) 50 Mean age: 48.2 (–) 17 (34%) NF 42 (80%) GH 5 (10%) PRL 3 (6%) >4 cm 50 (38%)
 Gondim (2015) Retrospective case series Inclusion: NFPA exclusion: previous surgery, age >70 (2000–2012) 55 Mean age: 72.5 (SD: 2) 23 (42%) NF 55 (100%) Mean size 33 mm (SD: 23) 55 (78%)
 Ferreli (2014) Retrospective case series Inclusion: NFPA with cavernous sinus invasion. Exclusion: grade 1 and 2 according to Knosp; patients who had previously been treated with radiotherapy in the pituitary region; patients with follow-up shorter than 36 months. (2000–2010) 56 median: 59 (37–79) 20 (36%) NF 56 (100%) 34 > 1 cm, 22 > 4 cm 17/56 (30%)
 Han (2013) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PA, endoscopic endonasal approach (2009–2012) 250 Mean age: 43.8 (–) 151 (60%) NF 147 (58.8%), PRL 33 (13.2%), GH 42 (16.8%), ACTH 20 (8%), TSH 3 (1.2%), mixed 5 (2%) 116 Macroadenomas 250 (86%)
 Jho (1997) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PA endoscopic endonasal approach (1993–1995) 15 Median age: 43 (range 17–88) 9 (60%) NF 6 (40%), PRL 5 (33.3%), ACTH 3 (20%), adenoma 1 (6.7%) NS NS
 Koutourousiou (2013) Retrospective case series Inclusion: giant PA with diameter >4 cm (2002–2011) 54 Mean age: 53 (–) 8 (15%) NS Mean: 32.88 cm3 (–) 11 (20%)
 Kuo (2016) Retrospective case series Inclusion: giant PA size (> 4 cm in at least 1 direction or estimated tumor volume > 10 cm3) (2002–2009) 38 Mean age: 51 (SD: 13) 23 (60%) NS Mean: 3.2 cm3 (SD: 4.6) 38 (21%)
 Marenco (2011) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PA: >65 years old, non-functioning (2001–2013) 25 Mean age: 72 (SD: 5) 14 (56%) NF 25 (100%) Mean: 3.4 cm (SD: 7.3) 25 (31%)
 Sabry (2015) Retrospective case series Inclusion: endonasally operated PA 40 Median: 48 years (range 18–81) 18 (45%) NS Volume: 9.48 cm3 (SD 12.7) 33 (83%)
 Wongsirisuwan (2014) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PA operated with keyhole and endonasal approach (2003–2013) 38/130 NS NS NS NS NS
 Zhan (2015) Retrospective case series Inclusion: PA patients resected endoscopically (2008–2014) 313 NS 125 (39%) NS NS 239 (75%)

NS not specified, SD standard deviation, NF non-functioning, ACHT adrenocorticotrophic hormone, GH growth hormone, TSH thyroid stimulating hormone, PRL prolactinoma, PA pituitary adenoma