Table 1. SIMPER and ANOVA analysis on the effects of time since agricultural abandonment on rhizosphere fungi actively assimilating root exudates.
Treatment |
Treatment effect |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTU number | Function | Phyla | Class | Order | Taxon | Variation explained (%) | Recent | Mid-term | Long term | F (H) | P | |
Otu05302 | Unc. Ascomycota | Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Pleosporales sp. | 5.58 | 3.42 (±1.30)* | 14.17 (±3.26) | 0.66 (±0.19) | 16.69 | 0.004 | |
Otu05176 | Unclassified | Unclassified | Unclassified | Unclassified | Unclassified | 2.91 | 0.95 (±0.42) | 8.11 (±3.16) | 0.37 (±0.14) | 6.91 | 0.028 | |
Otu04821 | Unc. Ascomycota | Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Pleosporales sp. | 2.10 | 4.52 (±0.57)* | 0.78 (±0.07) | 2.73 (±2.75)* | 2.70 | 0.146 | |
Otu05253 | Unc. Ascomycota | Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Dendryphion sp. | 1.96 | 0.64 (±0.16) | 0.14 (±0.04) | 0.34 (±0.14) | 2.98 | 0.126 | |
Otu05238 | Unc. Ascomycota | Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Trichoderma sp. | 1.95 | 1.38 (±0.22) | 2.93 (±1.02) | 1.94 (±0.32) | 1.17 | 0.372 | |
Otu05163 | Unc. Ascomycota | Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Fusarium sp. | 1.81 | 7.12 (±1.59) | 7.17 (±0.57) | 7.73 (±3.03) | 0.05 | 0.954 | |
Otu05264 | Unc. Ascomycota | Ascomycota | Pezizomycetes | Unclassified | Pezizomycetes sp. | 1.63 | 1.88 (±0.67) | 3.71 (±1.09) | 3.73 (±2.86) | 0.22 | 0.811 | |
Otu05193 | Mold | Ascomycota | Eurotiomycetes | Eurotiales | Trichocomaceae sp. | 1.59 | 2.52 (±1.75)* | 2.85 (±1.20)* | 4.57 (±1.79)* | 0.35 | 0.718 | |
Otu05099 | Endophyte | Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Drechslera sp. BAFC3419 | 1.54 | 4.41 (±3.44) | 1.68 (±1.31) | 1.19 (±0.52) | 0.49 | 0.638 | |
Otu05240 | Animal pathogen | Ascomycota | Eurotiomycetes | Chaetothyriales | Exophiala equina | 1.34 | 3.84 (±1.35) | 2.86 (±0.62) | 6.26 (±1.02) | 2.10 | 0.200 | |
Otu04695 | Mold | Ascomycota | Eurotiomycetes | Eurotiales | Aspergillus sp. | 1.31 | 0.38 (±1.58) | 1.81 (±1.40) | 2.35 (±1.53) | 1.53 | 0.290 | |
Otu05105 | Unclassified | Unclassified | Unclassified | Unclassified | Unclassified | 1.24 | 0.79 (±0.23) | 1.13 (±0.48) | 3.78 (±1.66) | 2.52 | 0.150 | |
Otu05177 | Unc. Ascomycota | Ascomycota | Unclassified | Unclassified | Unclassified | 1.11 | 1.37 (±0.39) | 0.37 (±0.11) | 3.57 (±2.12)* | 5.6 (H) | 0.062 | |
Otu05254 | Unc. Ascomycota | Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Unclassified | 1.07 | 2.38 (±1.43) | 0.29 (±0.07) | 2.41 (±1.78) | 0.90 | 0.449 | |
Otu05212 | Unc. Ascomycota | Ascomycota | Unclassified | Unclassified | Unclassified | 1.05 | 0.62 (±0.15) | 2.32 (±0.57) | 2.17 (±1.83) | 0.53 | 0.611 | |
Otu05235 | Yeast | Basidiomycota | Tremellomycetes | Trichosporonales | Trichosporon sp. | 1.01 | 0.97 (±0.36)* | 1.93 (±0.85) | 0.32 (±0.23) | 15.12 | 0.005 | |
Otu05120 | Unc. Ascomycota | Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Unclassified | Unclassified | 0.81 | 2.49 (±2.16) | 0.09 (±0.09) | 0.63 (±0.55) | 0.6 (H) | 0.723 | |
Otu05027 | Unc. Ascomycota | Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | Capnodiales | Davidiellaceae sp. | 0.80 | 3.21 (±0.60) | 0.61 (±0.25) | 1.14 (±0.34) | 10.40 | 0.008 | |
Otu05243 | Saprotrophs | Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Chaetosphaeriales | Chloridium sp. GHJ3 | 0.73 | 0.91 (±0.28) | 2.70 (±0.43) | 1.64 (±0.91) | 0.98 | 0.427 | |
Otu05269 | Mold | Ascomycota | Eurotiomycetes | Eurotiales | Penicillium sp. | 0.60 | 0.14 (±0.08) | 2.38 (±1.26) | 0.18 (±0.10) | 5.42 (H) | 0.071 |
Abbreviation: ANOVA, analysis of variance. Asterisk behind the abundance in a treatment indicates that the same OTU was identified as one of the most connected OTUs in that treatment using network approaches. Values in bold denote significant differences between treatments.