Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 20;8:42. doi: 10.1186/s13326-017-0151-z

Table 6.

Results obtained from detection of similar data items for different templates

Keyword Number of data after running predefined query Number of similar data Human Judgment
Template label: 1
MJFJKKXQDNNUJF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 10 8 Yes
MSTNYGQPCMXVAQ-KIYNQFGBSA-N 30 12 Yes
PMATZTZNYRCHOR-IMVLJIQENA-N 5 3 Yes
GUGOEEXESWIERI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 347 99 No
SEKGMJVHSBBHRD-WZHZPDAFSA-M 6 2 Yes
HSMNQINEKMPTIC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 341 106 No
Template label: 2
C1 = CC(=CC(=C1)F)CSC2 = NC3 = C(N2)C = NC = C3 4 3 Yes
CCOC(=O)C1(CCN(C)CC1)c2ccccc2 104 65 No
C1CCC(CC1)N2C(=O)C3 = CC = CC = C3N = C2SCC#N 3 2 Yes
CC1CCCCC1NC(=S)NC2 = CC = C(C = C2)SC(F)F 2 0 Yes
CC1(CC1(Cl)Cl)C(=O)NNC(=O)C2CCCCC2 7 3 Yes
Nc1nc(O)c2NC(CNc3ccc(cc3)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(=O)O)C(=O)O)CNc2n1 23 18 Yes
Template label: 3
AAAAKTROWFNLEP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2 0 Yes
MIQPIUSUKVNLNT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 107 41 No
STQGQHZAVUOBTE-VGBVRHCVSA-N 149 50 Yes
UWWDHYUMIORJTA-HSQYWUDLSA-N 2 0 Yes
XCGSFFUVFURLIX-VFGNJEKYSA-N 20 2 Yes
ZPEIMTDSQAKGNT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 117 44 Yes
Total matching: 92% (over all 50 test cases)