TABLE 1—
2014 Dentist Density | 2014 Dentists Participating in Medicaid, % | 2013 Reimbursement Rate, % | No. of States | States | 2014 Observed Access Rate, % | Difference in Observed Access Rate From High Reimbursement Rate States, % | Predicted Access Rate if Low Reimbursement Rate States Had High Reimbursement Rates, %a | Difference in Predicted Access Rate From Observed Access Rate, %a | Predicted No. of Additional Children With Access With High Reimbursement Rates |
Low | Low | Low (41) | 10 | FL, KS, KY, ME, MO, NC, NV, OH, RI, WI | 40.2 | −9.1 | 51.9 | 11.7 | 1 048 724 |
Low | High | Low (45) | 3 | IA, ID, MS | 51.0 | . . . | . . . | . . . | . . . |
High | Low | Low (39) | 9 | CA, HI, IL, MD, NH, NY, OR, VA, WA | 50.2 | −3.9 | 54.8 | 4.6 | 506 442 |
High | High | Low (39) | 6 | CO, MI, MN, NE, PA, UT | 45.7 | −2.5 | 48.0 | 2.3 | 299 807 |
Note. High = above the mean; low = below the mean.
Access rate predicted with linear regression estimating effect of 3-way interaction of reimbursement rate, dentist density, and Medicaid dentists on access rate while controlling for median household income and an oral health index.