Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep;90:161–166. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2017.07.006

Table 1.

Qualitative comparison of library preparation methods for single-cell RNAseq. Note that full-length methods are not compatible with UMIs, and that all UMI methods capture only the 3′ end of the transcript. In-vitro transcription methods also include UMIs. Precision defined as reproducibility of the gene expression quantification. More the (+) signs, higher the costs or amplification bias or number of genes or cells (Ziegenhain et al., 2017).

Technology No. of cells No. of genes Amplification bias Cost
Full-length cDNA methods Smart-seq/C1 + ++ +++ ++
Smart-seq2 ++ ++++ +++ +++
UMI methods SCRB-seq +++ +++ ++ +
Drop-seq ++++ + ++ +
In-vitro transcription methods MARS-seq +++ + + +
CEL-seq2/C1 ++ ++ + ++