Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Popul Environ. 2017 Jan 27;38(4):381–406. doi: 10.1007/s11111-016-0267-6

Table A2.

Effect estimates from models of desired family size (Coombs Scale) at follow-up and neighborhood change. Women aged 15–33 in Chitwan, Nepal at baseline.

1 2 3 4

Market School Employer Health Post
Hours to collect fodder in 1996 0.11* (2.13) 0.11* (2.27) 0.12* (2.37) 0.10* (2.00)
Change in hours to collect fodder in 1996–2006 (continuous) 0.13** (3.27) 0.13** (3.25) 0.13** (3.28) 0.13** (3.21)
Community context
 Distance to neighborhood organization in 1996a −0.01 (−1.47) −0.02* (−2.44) −0.01 (−1.29) 0 (0.88)
 Change distance to neighborhood organization 1996–2003 −0.02* (−2.06) −0.03+ (−1.91) 0 (−0.61) 0 (0.78)
Baseline desired family size (Coombs Scale) 0.12*** (4.62) 0.12*** (4.41) 0.12*** (4.38) 0.12*** (4.50)

Respondents 1241 1241 1241 1241

Adjusted R-square 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12

Effect estimates with t-statistics in parantheses. Models also include all controls described in text and in Table A1 and an intercept term.

+

0.10

*

0.05

**

0.01

***

0.001;

two-tailed tests

a

Distance to each neighborhood organization was collected using the Neighborhood History Calendar approach. Distances are measured in minutes walk from the neighborhood center to each specific building.