Table 5. Pairwise comparisons of AUROC curves referring to the glaucoma group.
| Difference between AUROCs | SE | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| whole retina macular VD and FAZ perimeter | 0.033 | 0.037 | 0.37 |
| whole retina macular VD and FAZ circularity index | 0.059 | 0.044 | 0.18 |
| whole retina macular VD and peripapillary RNFL thickness | 0.11 | 0.040 | 0.0047* |
| whole retina macular VD and macular GCIPL thickness | 0.096 | 0.043 | 0.025 |
| FAZ perimeter and FAZ circularity index | 0.026 | 0.033 | 0.44 |
| FAZ perimeter and peripapillary RNFL thickness | 0.081 | 0.036 | 0.024 |
| FAZ perimeter and macular GCIPL thickness | 0.062 | 0.041 | 0.13 |
| FAZ circularity index and peripapillary RNFL thickness | 0.055 | 0.036 | 0.13 |
| FAZ circularity index and macular GCIPL thickness | 0.037 | 0.041 | 0.38 |
| Peripapillary RNFL thickness and macular GCIPL thickness | 0.018 | 0.020 | 0.36 |
AUROC = Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristics; SE = standard error; VD = vascular density; FAZ = foveal avascular zone; GCIPL = ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer; RNFL = retinal nerve fiber layer.
*Statistical significance was found using the method described by deLong et al. Bonferroni correction was perfomed to adjust for type I error (P<0.005).