Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 21;7:12096. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12317-3

Table 1.

Comparison of clinical CNVs identified in the two groups of our ASD subjects.

Group 1 (Retrospective cases) Group 2 (Prospective cases) Total Chi squared test (Ρ - value)*
N = 68 N = 46 N = 114
Pathogenic CNVs and VOUS 15/68 (22%) 14/46 (30.4%) 29/114 (25.4%) 0.31
Pathogenic CNVs and VOUS, likely pathogenic CNVs 9/68 (13.2%) 5/46 (10.9%) 14/114 (12.3%) 0.71
Pathogenic CNVs 3/68 (4.4%) 4/46 (8.7%) 7/114 (6.1%) 0.35
Deletion 1 3 4
Duplication 2 1 3
VOUS 12/68 (17.6%) 10/46 (21.7%) 22/114 (19.3%) 0.59
VOUS, likely pathogenic CNVs 6/68 (8.8%) 1/46 (2.2%) 7/114 (6.1%) 0.15
Deletion 2 1 3
Duplication 4 0 4
VOUS, likely benign CNVs 3/68 (4.4%) 2/46 (4.3%) 5/114 (4.4%) 0.99
Deletion 2 1 3
Duplication 1 1 2
VOUS (no subclassification) 3/68 (4.4%) 7/46 (15.2%) 10/114 (8.7%) 0.04
Deletion 1 2 3
Duplication 2 5 7
Benign 53/68 (78%) 32/46 (69.6%) 85/114 (74.6%) 0.31

The group 1 patients were first evaluated for the common genetic causes of ASD and all patients had normal karyotype and negative DNA tests for Fragile X syndrome and MECP2 mutations. Therefore, group 1 represented the ASD patients with the use of CMA as a second line test and group 2 represented the ASD patients with the use of CMA as the first-tier test. VOUS, Variant of uncertain clinical significance; *P-values were calculated using Chi-square test using GraphPad QuickCalcs (https://graphpad.com/quickcalcs/contingency1.cfm).