Table 3.

Mean baseline values and mean change outcome values at follow-ups, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) among study participants. Values are model-based and adjusted for age and specific parameter values measured 6 weeks prior to study registration

Parameters of alcohol consumption		Controls		Wait list		TeleCoach		TeleCoach vs. controlsa
		Mean	95% C.I.	Mean	95% C.I.	Mean	95% C.I.	Z	p values
Quantity	Baseline	16.57	15.75; 17.38	17.20	16.07; 18.34	16.71	15.38; 18.04
	First follow-up	−2.38	−3.55; −1.21	−2.58	−4.57; −0.58	−4.76	−6.67; −2.85	−2.09	0.037
	Second follow-up	−2.49	−3.54; −1.45	−3.37	−4.98; −1.76	−3.80	−5.97; −1.63	−1.07	0.286
Frequency	Baseline	3.43	3.26; 3.62	3.36	3.18; 3.53	3.41	3.23; 3.61
	First follow-up	−0.42	−0.67; −0.17	−0.49	−0.84; −0.14	−0.83	−1.14; −0.52	−2.04	0.041
	Second follow-up	−0.51	−0.73; −0.29	−0.63	−0.89; −0.38	−0.89	−1.16; −0.62	−2.12	0.034
Binge occasions	Baseline	1.87	1.75; 1.98	1.96	1.78; 2.14	1.86	1.69; 2.03
	First follow-up	−0.26	−0.45; −0.07	−0.34	−0.64; −0.05	−0.52	−0.77; −0.28	−1.69	0.090
	Second follow-up	−0.25	−0.40; −0.11	−0.38	−0.61; −0.15	−0.42	−0.69; −0.14	−1.01	0.312
Average eBACb	Baseline	0.04	0.03; 0.04	0.04	0.04; 0.05	0.04	0.03; 0.04
	First follow-up	−0.00	−0.01; −0.00	−0.01	−0.01; −0.00	−0.01	−0.01; −0.00	−1.22	0.221
	Second follow-up	−0.01	−0.01; −0.00	−0.01	−0.02; −0.01	−0.01	−0.01; −0.00	−0.31	0.757
Peak eBACc	Baseline	1.92	1.80; 2.05	2.09	1.88; 2.29	1.82	1.68; 1.96
	First follow-up	−0.10	−0.26; 0.07	−0.28	−0.57; 0.01	−0.23	−0.40; −0.06	−1.07	0.283
	Second follow-up	−0.17	−0.36; 0.01	−0.36	−0.62; −0.10	−0.39	−0.54; −0.23	−1.72	0.086

^aOnly comparisons between the TeleCoach and assessment-only control groups are shown here. Wait list-control and TeleCoach-wait list comparisons did not render any significant results and are therefore not shown

^bPer week

^cDuring the last month