Table 3.
Acetate | Trimethylamine | Ac + TMA | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUC | 95% CI | p value | AUC | 95% CI | p value | AUC | 95% CI | p value | |
E. coli-pos vs CTRLs | 0.92 | 0.81-1.0 | <0.0001 | 0.89 | 0.79-0.99 | <0.0001 | 0.94 | 0.86-1.0 | <0.0001 |
E. coli-pos vs non-E. coli | 0.86 | 0.74-0.99 | <0.0001 | 0.70 | 0.50-0.9 | <0.0001 | 0.84 | 0.70-0.98 | 0.0003 |
E. coli-pos vs All | 0.89 | 0.80-0.98 | <0.0001 | 0.80 | 0.67-0.94 | 0.0002 | 0.89 | 0.80-0.99 | <0.0001 |
Urine samples positive for E. coli infections were compared to CTRLs, non-E. coli and All patients
The area under the curve (AUC), the 95% confidence interval (CI), and the p values are reported. The ROC curves were built using Acetate and Trimethylamine, individually, or combining both concentrations