Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 19;2(4):227–232. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2015.09.001

Table 2.

Cognitively normal (CNR) and below normal range (BNR) patient and control group comparisons on MCCB and WRAT-4 measures.

1.CNR Patients (n = 17) 2.CNR Controls (n = 24) 3.BNR Patients (n = 19) 4.BNR Controls (n = 20) F (3, 75) Post hoc Comparisons
WRAT-4 Reading 100.53 (6.17) 101.08 (8.76) 85.68 (8.04) 85.00 (7.79) 24.24 1 > 3,4; 2 > 3,4
Reading/MCCB discrepancy 3.44 (6.91) 2.17 (5.06) 14.79 (6.42) 15.42 (9.32) 18.72 1 < 3,4; 2 < 3,4
Trials-to-decision (Beads task) 10.29 (2.42) 8.67 (4.56) 6.06 (4.83) 5.05 (3.30) 6.86 1 > 3,4; 2 > 4
Reading the Mind in the Eyes 25.71 (3.16) 26.17 (3.62) 10.68 (2.54) 10.95 (3.33) 12.78 1 > 3,4; 2 > 3,4
Externalizing Bias 3.06 (4.19) 2.62 (3.84) 0.50 (3.13) 2.95 (3.72) 1.88

Note. MCCB = MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery composite T score; WRAT-4 = Wide Range Achievement Test-4 (standard score).

p < .05.