Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Rehabil Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):38–45.

Table 2.

Functional mobility assessment.

Score Pain 0–10 scale (0 = none, 10 = worst) Function TUDS TUG

Time (seconds) HR (beats per minute) RPE (6–20 scale) Time (seconds) HR (beats per minute) RPL (6–20 scale)
5 0 ≤8 ≤127 ≤7 ≤4 ≤127 ≤7
4 1–2 9–12 128–137 8–9 5 128–137 8–9
3 3–1 13–16 138–147 10–11 6 138–147 10–11
2 5–6 17–20 148–157 12–13 7 148–157 12–13
1 7–8 21–24 158–167 14–15 8 158–167 14–15
0 9–10 >24 >167 >15 >8 >167 >15
Subtotal score
Score Supports Satisfaction with my walking quality Participation Endurance (9-min walk run)

Distance (feet PCI HR RPE

5 None Very satisfied Participate in work or school and sports ≥4000 ≤0.20 <115 ≤7
4 1 crutch or cane <5 h a day Happy with my walking quality Participate in all activities including work/school, but limited sports 3000–3999 0.21–0.41 115–134 8–9
3 1 crutch or cane all day Happy but hope it improves Limited in work or school and sports 2250–2999 0.42–0.62 135–154 10–11
2 2 crutches or canes <5 h a day Disappointed and want to improve Limited in work or school and do not participate in sports 1500–2249 0.63–483 155–174 12–13
1 2 crutches or canes >5 h a day Disappointed and afraid it will not improve Limited in work or school and activities of daily living 1000–1499 0.84–1.09 175–194 14–15
0 Wheelchair Very unhappy and rarely leave the house Unable to go to work or school <1000 ≥1.10 ≥195 >15
Subtotal
Total (add all 14 boxes (range 0–70)

Timed up and down stairs (TUDS), timed up and go (TUG), heart rate (HR), rating of perceived exertion (RPL), physiological cost index (PCI)PCl = HR end of walk -HR beginning of walk (/metres walkcd/9 min.